Ostovar Shahriar, Allahbakhshian Atefeh, Gholizadeh Leila, Dizaji Sima Lak, Sarbakhsh Parvin, Ghahramanian Akram
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Department Medical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):107-112. doi: 10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_291_18.
Oral debriefing (OD) and video-assisted debriefing (VAD) are commonly used debriefing methods, with no evidence of superiority of one to another. The present study aimed to compare the effects of OD and VAD on the development of learning outcomes in nursing students. This is a quasi-experimental study. A total of 50 first-year nursing students participated in this study. Participants in the control group participated in OD and those in the intervention group took part in VAD. Debriefing improved psychomotor skills, self-confidence, and student satisfaction in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between OD and VAD in the study outcomes. Both OD and VAD methods have significantly positive impact on simulation outcomes and can increase preparedness of nursing students before entering the clinical settings. Given the widespread use of simulation, more studies are needed to evaluate different methods of debriefing to optimize the usefulness of simulation-based learning.
口头汇报（OD）和视频辅助汇报（VAD）是常用的汇报方法，没有证据表明一种方法优于另一种。本研究旨在比较OD和VAD对护生学习成果发展的影响。这是一项准实验研究。共有50名一年级护生参与了本研究。对照组的参与者参与OD，干预组的参与者参与VAD。汇报提高了两组的操作技能、自信心和学生满意度。在研究结果方面，OD和VAD之间没有统计学上的显著差异。OD和VAD方法对模拟结果都有显著的积极影响，并且可以提高护生进入临床实习前的准备程度。鉴于模拟的广泛应用，需要更多的研究来评估不同的汇报方法，以优化基于模拟的学习的效用。
