• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较护理学生基础生命支持技能的实时反馈和视频记录的反馈。

Comparison of real-time feedback and debriefing by video recording on basic life support skill in nursing students.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Torbat Jam Faculty of Medical Sciences, Torbat Jam, Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran.

Clinical Research Development Unit, Sajjadieh Hospital, Torbat Jam Faculty of Medical Sciences, Torbat Jam, Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 25;23(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03951-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-022-03951-1
PMID:36698121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9878936/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation skill have a direct impact on its success rate. Choosing the right method to acquire this skill can lead to effective performance. This investigation was conducted to compare the effect of Real-time feedback and debriefing by video recording on basic life support skill in nursing students.

METHODS

This quasi-experimental study was performed on 67 first year nursing students. First, a theoretical basic life support (BLS) training session was held for the all participants, at the end of session the pre-test was taken. Students were randomly assigned to two groups. A 4-hour practical BLS training session was conducted in the real - time feedback group as well as the debriefing by video recording group, and at the end of the training, a post-test was taken from each group. Each group received a post-test. Data were analyzed using SPSS 25 software.

RESULTS

Results showed a significant difference between mean (SD) of debriefing by video recording group in pre-test and post-test (p < 0.001) and in the real-time feedback group there was a significant difference between mean (SD) in pre-test and post-test (p < 0.001), respectively. In addition, there was no significant difference between the mean score of basic life support skill in real-time feedback and debriefing by video recording.

CONCLUSIONS

Both real-time feedback and debriefing by video recording were effective on basic life support skill.

摘要

背景

心肺复苏技能对其成功率有直接影响。选择正确的方法来获得这项技能可以实现有效的表现。这项调查旨在比较实时反馈和视频记录反馈在护理学生基本生命支持技能中的效果。

方法

这项准实验研究纳入了 67 名一年级护理学生。首先,所有参与者都进行了基本生命支持(BLS)的理论培训课程,在课程结束时进行了预测试。学生被随机分配到两个组。在实时反馈组和视频记录反馈组中进行了 4 小时的 BLS 实践培训课程,在培训结束时,对每个组进行了后测。每个组都接受了后测。使用 SPSS 25 软件对数据进行分析。

结果

结果显示,视频记录反馈组的预测试和后测试的平均分(SD)之间存在显著差异(p<0.001),实时反馈组的预测试和后测试的平均分(SD)之间也存在显著差异(p<0.001)。此外,实时反馈和视频记录反馈在基本生命支持技能的平均分上没有显著差异。

结论

实时反馈和视频记录反馈在基本生命支持技能方面都有效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/225c/9878936/c971e09711f1/12909_2022_3951_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/225c/9878936/c971e09711f1/12909_2022_3951_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/225c/9878936/c971e09711f1/12909_2022_3951_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of real-time feedback and debriefing by video recording on basic life support skill in nursing students.比较护理学生基础生命支持技能的实时反馈和视频记录的反馈。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 25;23(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03951-1.
2
The effect of scenario-based training versus video training on nurse anesthesia students' basic life support knowledge and skill of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a quasi-experimental comparative study.基于情景的培训与视频培训对护士麻醉学生心肺复苏基本生命支持知识和技能的影响:一项准实验性比较研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 9;24(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05490-3.
3
Comparative study on the impact of 'Infographic versus video feedback' on enhancing students' clinical skills in basic life support.对比研究“信息图与视频反馈”对增强基础生命支持学生临床技能的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 19;24(1):779. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05763-x.
4
Does video feedback analysis improve CPR performance in phase 5 medical students?视频反馈分析能否提高五年级医学生的心肺复苏表现?
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 12;16(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0726-x.
5
Learning Impacts of Pretraining Video-Assisted Debriefing With Simulated Errors or Trainees' Errors in Medical Students in Basic Life Support Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial.在基础生命支持培训中,对医学生进行预训练视频辅助反馈,包括模拟错误或学员错误的学习效果:一项随机对照试验。
Simul Healthc. 2019 Dec;14(6):372-377. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000391.
6
Pre-training evaluation and feedback improve medical students' skills in basic life support.预培训评估和反馈提高医学生基本生命支持技能。
Med Teach. 2011;33(10):e549-55. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.600360.
7
The effect of peer-group size on the delivery of feedback in basic life support refresher training: a cluster randomized controlled trial.同伴小组规模对基础生命支持复习培训中反馈传递的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 4;16:167. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0682-5.
8
Peer video feedback builds basic life support skills: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.同伴视频反馈可提高基本生命支持技能:一项随机对照非劣效试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0254923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254923. eCollection 2021.
9
The timing of testing influences skill retention after basic life support training: a prospective quasi-experimental study.测试时间影响基础生命支持培训后的技能保留:一项前瞻性准实验研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Dec 4;19(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1881-7.
10
Effectiveness of an educational intervention on first-year nursing students' knowledge and confidence to perform basic life support: a quasi-experimental study.一项教育干预措施对一年级护理专业学生进行基本生命支持的知识和信心的有效性:一项准实验研究。
Contemp Nurse. 2023 Dec;59(6):478-490. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2023.2287075. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of CPR feedback devices in resuscitation training: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.心肺复苏反馈设备在复苏培训中的应用:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Resusc Plus. 2025 Mar 22;23:100939. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100939. eCollection 2025 May.
2
The effects of personalized video feedback of basic cardiac life support on knowledge and skills levels in undergraduate nursing students: a randomized controlled trial.基础心脏生命支持个性化视频反馈对本科护生知识和技能水平的影响:一项随机对照试验
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06935-z.
3
Evaluating video-supported layperson CPR compared to a standard training course: A randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Executive summary.欧洲复苏理事会指南 2021:执行摘要。
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:1-60. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
2
Basic Life Support Training for undergraduate nursing students: An integrative review.本科护生基础生命支持培训:一项综合评价。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Jan;50:102957. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102957. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
3
Part 1: Executive Summary: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.
评估视频辅助的非专业人员心肺复苏与标准培训课程的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Dec 6;20:100835. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100835. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Comparative study on the impact of 'Infographic versus video feedback' on enhancing students' clinical skills in basic life support.对比研究“信息图与视频反馈”对增强基础生命支持学生临床技能的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 19;24(1):779. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05763-x.
第1部分:执行摘要:2020年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南。
Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S337-S357. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000918. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
4
Real-time feedback improves chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective cohort study.实时反馈可提高院外心脏骤停患者的胸外按压质量:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 24;15(2):e0229431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229431. eCollection 2020.
5
Nursing students' knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy in blended learning of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial.护理专业学生心肺复苏术混合式学习的知识、态度、自我效能感:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Nov 9;19(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1848-8.
6
Effects of post-scenario debriefing versus stop-and-go debriefing in medical simulation training on skill acquisition and learning experience: a randomized controlled trial.医学模拟训练中情景后反思与停停走走式反思对技能获取和学习体验的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Sep 5;19(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1772-y.
7
Effect of real-time visual feedback device 'Quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (QCPR) Classroom' with a metronome sound on layperson CPR training in Japan: a cluster randomized control trial.实时视觉反馈设备“质量心肺复苏(QCPR)教室”与节拍器声音对日本非专业人员 CPR 培训的效果:一项群组随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 11;9(6):e026140. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026140.
8
Comparison of the effects of debriefing methods on psychomotor skills, self-confidence, and satisfaction in novice nursing students: A quasi-experimental study.汇报方法对新手护生心理运动技能、自信心和满意度影响的比较:一项准实验研究。
J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):107-112. doi: 10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_291_18.
9
Impact of a CPR feedback device on healthcare provider workload during simulated cardiac arrest.CPR 反馈装置对模拟心搏骤停期间医疗保健提供者工作量的影响。
Resuscitation. 2018 Sep;130:111-117. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.06.035. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
10
Real-time visual feedback during training improves laypersons' CPR quality: a randomized controlled manikin study.实时视觉反馈在培训中提高非专业人员 CPR 质量的效果:一项随机对照模拟人研究。
CJEM. 2017 Nov;19(6):480-487. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.410. Epub 2017 Jan 24.