Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Asyut, Egypt.
Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):1939-1949. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5757-8. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
To retrospectively evaluate tumor response, local tumor control, and patient survival after the treatment of pulmonary metastases using transpulmonary chemoembolization (TPCE) in palliative and neoadjuvant intent.
One hundred forty-three patients (mean age 56.7 ± 13.4 years) underwent repetitive TPCE (mean number of sessions 5.8 ± 2.9) between June 2005 and April 2017 for the treatment of unresectable lung metastases, not responding to systemic chemotherapy. Patients had predominant lung metastases with bilateral lung involvement in 80.4% of the cases. Regional delivery of the chemotherapeutic agents was performed through selective catheterization of the tumor-supplying pulmonary arteries with subsequent injection of iodized oil and microspheres. Patients, who underwent subsequent ablation (n = 51), either for all lesions (complete) or dominant lesions (incomplete), constituted the neoadjuvant group, and those who underwent TPCE alone represented the palliative treatment intent (n = 92). The response was assessed according to the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).
Partial response was achieved in 11.9% (n = 17), stable disease in 66.4% (n = 95), and progressive disease in 21.7% (n = 31). The mean survival time and time to progression were 24.5 ± 1.7 and 7.5 ± 0.5 months, respectively. The mean survival time was shorter for the palliative group (19.7 ± 2), compared to the neoadjuvant group (30.1 ± 2.6 months). The use of TPCE alone or with incomplete ablation had a significantly increased hazard of death of 4.6- (p = 0.002) and 3.1-fold (p = 0.027), respectively, in comparison with TPCE with subsequent complete ablation.
TPCE has the potential to improve local tumor control and to prolong survival with a neoadjuvant potential when combined with ablation therapy.
• Transpulmonary chemoembolization (TPCE) is a locoregional technique for delivering chemotherapy in higher intratumoral concentrations and with reduced systemic toxicity. • TPCE can be an alternative treatment for patients with pulmonary metastases who failed prior systemic chemotherapy or with post-operative recurrence. • The current retrospective study revealed that TPCE is a feasible treatment option for patients with unrespectable lung secondaries in both palliative and neoadjuvant intent and has the potential of improving local control and prolonging survival.
回顾性评估经肺化疗栓塞术(TPCE)治疗不可切除肺转移瘤的姑息性和新辅助性治疗中的肿瘤反应、局部肿瘤控制和患者生存情况。
2005 年 6 月至 2017 年 4 月期间,143 例(平均年龄 56.7±13.4 岁)患者因肺转移瘤不可切除且对全身化疗无反应而行重复 TPCE(平均治疗次数 5.8±2.9 次)。80.4%的患者存在双侧肺受累的优势肺转移。通过选择性导管插入肿瘤供血的肺动脉,然后注入碘油和微球,实现区域化疗药物输送。随后进行消融(n=51)的患者构成新辅助组,其中所有病变(完全)或优势病变(不完全)均接受消融,仅行 TPCE 的患者构成姑息性治疗组(n=92)。根据实体瘤反应评价标准(RECIST)评估反应。
部分缓解 11.9%(n=17),稳定疾病 66.4%(n=95),进展疾病 21.7%(n=31)。平均生存时间和进展时间分别为 24.5±1.7 和 7.5±0.5 个月。姑息治疗组的平均生存时间(19.7±2 个月)短于新辅助治疗组(30.1±2.6 个月)。与 TPCE 联合完全消融相比,单独使用 TPCE 或不完全消融的患者死亡风险显著增加 4.6-(p=0.002)和 3.1 倍(p=0.027)。
TPCE 具有改善局部肿瘤控制和延长生存时间的潜力,在联合消融治疗时具有新辅助潜力。
• 经肺化疗栓塞术(TPCE)是一种局部区域技术,可在肿瘤内提供更高浓度的化疗药物,并减少全身毒性。• TPCE 可作为肺转移瘤患者的替代治疗方法,这些患者在接受系统化疗后失败或在术后复发。• 目前的回顾性研究显示,TPCE 是一种可行的治疗选择,无论是姑息性还是新辅助性治疗,都具有改善局部控制和延长生存的潜力。