Rath Prasan Deep, Chen Der-Yuan, Gu Jieruo, Lee Vivian W Y, Al Ani Nizar Abdulateef, Shirazy Khalid, Llamado Lyndon
Max Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India.
Department of Medicine, Center of Rheumatology and Immunology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Int J Rheum Dis. 2019 Jan;22(1):9-24. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13371. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
Although anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents have greatly improved the management of rheumatic diseases, their cost limits access to many patients throughout the world. As a result, patients and clinicians have turned to biosimilars to provide similar efficacy at a lower cost. Many of the regulatory guidelines in the Asia Pacific region are largely based on those of the European Medicines Agency and the World Health Organization; however, there are variations between countries. Additionally, in some countries, intended copies are available that were approved prior to the development of guidelines and have not fulfilled the requirements of a biosimilar. We review the various regulatory requirements for biosimilars in the Asia Pacific region, the anti-TNF biosimilars and intended copies approved in the region, and whether clinical data are available for these agents. We discuss concerns about the need for additional regulations and education, and we provide recommendations for a multidisciplinary pharmacovigilance approach that closely monitors the safety of biosimilar use.
尽管抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)药物极大地改善了风湿性疾病的治疗,但它们的成本限制了全球许多患者的使用。因此,患者和临床医生转向生物类似药以较低成本提供相似疗效。亚太地区的许多监管指南很大程度上基于欧洲药品管理局和世界卫生组织的指南;然而,各国之间存在差异。此外,在一些国家,有在指南制定之前获批的意向仿制药,但未满足生物类似药的要求。我们回顾了亚太地区生物类似药的各种监管要求、该地区获批的抗TNF生物类似药和意向仿制药,以及这些药物是否有临床数据。我们讨论了对额外监管和教育需求的担忧,并为密切监测生物类似药使用安全性的多学科药物警戒方法提供建议。