Suppr超能文献

实际年龄:储存过程中的红细胞衰老。

Real Age: Red Blood Cell Aging During Storage.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Mar;107(3):973-980. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.08.073. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During cold storage, some red blood cell (RBC) units age more rapidly than others. Yet, the Food and Drug Administration has set a uniform storage limit of 42 days. Objectives of this review are to present evidence for an RBC storage lesion and suggest that functional measures of stored RBC quality-which we call real age-may be more appropriate than calendar age.

METHODS

During RBC storage, biochemical substances and byproducts accumulate and RBC shape alters. Factors that influence the rate of degradation include donor characteristics, bio-preservation conditions, and vesiculation. Better understanding of markers of RBC quality may lead to standardized, quantifiable, and operationally practical measures to improve donor selection, assess quality of an RBC unit, improve storage conditions, and test efficacy of the transfused product.

RESULTS

The conundrum is that clinical trials of younger versus older RBC units have not aligned with in vitro aging data; that is, the units transfused were not old enough. In vitro changes are considerable beyond 28 to 35 days, and average storage age for older transfused units was 14 to 21 days.

CONCLUSIONS

RBC product real age varies by donor characteristics, storage conditions, and biological changes during storage. Metrics to measure temporal changes in quality of the stored RBC product may be more appropriate than the 42-day expiration date. Randomized trials and observational studies are focused on average effect, but, in the evolving age of precision medicine, we must acknowledge that vulnerable populations and individuals may be harmed by aging blood.

摘要

背景

在冷藏过程中,一些红细胞(RBC)单位比其他单位衰老得更快。然而,食品和药物管理局设定了统一的储存期限为 42 天。本综述的目的是提出 RBC 储存损伤的证据,并表明储存 RBC 质量的功能测量——我们称之为实际年龄——可能比日历年龄更合适。

方法

在 RBC 储存过程中,生化物质和副产物会积累,RBC 形状会发生改变。影响降解速度的因素包括供体特征、生物保存条件和囊泡化。更好地了解 RBC 质量标志物可能会导致标准化、可量化和可操作的措施,以改善供体选择、评估 RBC 单位的质量、改善储存条件,并测试输注产品的疗效。

结果

难题在于,年轻 RBC 单位与年老 RBC 单位的临床试验与体外老化数据不一致;也就是说,输注的单位还不够老。在 28 至 35 天之后,体外变化相当大,而较老的输注单位的平均储存年龄为 14 至 21 天。

结论

RBC 产品的实际年龄因供体特征、储存条件和储存过程中的生物学变化而异。衡量储存 RBC 产品质量随时间变化的指标可能比 42 天的有效期更合适。随机试验和观察性研究侧重于平均效果,但在精准医学的发展时代,我们必须认识到,脆弱人群和个体可能会因老化血液而受到伤害。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验