School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, University of California, Merced 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95343, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Dec;219:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
Fatalism - beliefs about the causes and controllability of disease - has been negatively associated with prevention behaviors. Fatalism has been suggested as a mechanism for health disparities because ethnic minorities are especially likely to hold fatalistic beliefs. However, the construct has been criticized: Fatalism fails to account for structural barriers to health faced by vulnerable populations that also score highly on measures of fatalism. Another critique suggests that operationalizations of fatalism expose communication failures: "Fatalism" rather reflects information overload from an environment riddled with misinformation and contradictions. This study aimed to expand understanding of one mechanism through which communication may contribute to disparities by considering the context of nutrition among bicultural Latinas, who face increased risk from dietary acculturation.
Mixed-methods (semi-structured in-depth interview, survey) with Mexican-American women ages 18-29 (n = 24) in rural California.
Contrary to previous studies, the majority of this sample of Mexican-American women did not endorse fatalistic beliefs; most demonstrated clear understanding of the link between diet and risk of diseases: Diabetes and heart disease were understood to result from behaviors within one's control. Yet despite articulating links between diet and disease, participants felt overloaded and confused about conflicting information from public and interpersonal sources. Moreover, despite reporting feeling inundated with information, participants noted critical information gaps, distinguishing between information available and information needed.
We found minimal support for fatalistic beliefs among a sample of Mexican-American women, but considerable information overload and confusion, together with a desire for specific knowledge and skills. Results extend understanding of how communication may influence disparities: Information overload may be conflated with fatalism, challenging the notion that fatalism is a cultural belief. Moreover, inequalities in access to and ability to process information compound overload effects. We discuss opportunities to improve the clarity of communication about nutrition science and dietary recommendations.
宿命论——对疾病原因和可控制性的信念——与预防行为呈负相关。由于少数民族尤其可能持有宿命论信念,因此有人认为宿命论是造成健康差异的一个机制。然而,这一概念受到了批评:宿命论没有考虑到弱势群体面临的健康结构障碍,而这些弱势群体在宿命论的衡量标准上得分也很高。另一种批评认为,宿命论的操作化暴露了沟通失败:“宿命论”更多地反映了充满错误信息和矛盾的环境造成的信息过载。本研究旨在通过考虑双语拉丁裔女性的营养背景来扩大对一种沟通机制的理解,这些女性由于饮食文化适应而面临更高的风险。
采用混合方法(半结构式深入访谈、调查),对加利福尼亚州农村地区 18-29 岁的墨西哥裔美国女性(n=24)进行研究。
与之前的研究相反,本研究中大多数墨西哥裔美国女性不认同宿命论信念;大多数人清楚地认识到饮食与疾病风险之间的联系:糖尿病和心脏病被认为是由个人可控的行为引起的。然而,尽管参与者清楚地阐述了饮食与疾病之间的联系,但他们感到信息过载且对来自公共和人际来源的相互矛盾的信息感到困惑。此外,尽管报告感到信息泛滥,但参与者注意到了关键信息的差距,区分了可获得的信息和需要的信息。
我们在墨西哥裔美国女性样本中发现了对宿命论信念的支持很少,但存在相当多的信息过载和困惑,以及对特定知识和技能的渴望。结果扩展了对沟通如何影响差异的理解:信息过载可能与宿命论混淆,这对宿命论是一种文化信仰的观点提出了挑战。此外,获取和处理信息的不平等加剧了过载的影响。我们讨论了改善有关营养科学和饮食建议的沟通清晰度的机会。