Throsby Karen
Centre for Interdisciplinary Gender Studies, School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Sociol Health Illn. 2018 Jul;40(6):954-968. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12734. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
Sugar is increasingly supplanting fat as public enemy number one in public health campaigns, and calls for significant reductions in consumption have provided fertile ground for the proliferation of popular texts and services advocating sugar abstention. This article explores three modes of popular sugar abstention (evangelical, experimental and charitable). These vary in chronology, philosophy and the intensity of abstention, but all serve as sites of identity production and self-entrepreneurship for those able to advocate for, and engage with, them. The article argues that these abstention narratives are not only premised on the exercise of social privilege, but that they also necessarily reproduce and sediment those social hierarchies. This is achieved through a combination of nutritionism and healthism, dislocating sugar and its consumption from the vast social, economic and environmental inequalities within which both the consumption of sugar, and the act of giving it up, is made meaningful. (A virtual abstract of this paper can be found at: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_979cmCmR9rLrKuD7z0ycA).
在公共卫生运动中,糖正日益取代脂肪,成为头号公敌,呼吁大幅减少糖摄入量的声音为倡导戒糖的通俗文本和服务的激增提供了沃土。本文探讨了通俗的戒糖三种模式(福音派、实验性和慈善性)。这些模式在时间顺序、理念和戒糖强度上各不相同,但对于那些能够倡导并参与其中的人来说,它们都是身份认同构建和自我创业的场所。文章认为,这些戒糖叙事不仅以社会特权的行使为前提,而且必然会重现并巩固这些社会等级制度。这是通过营养主义和健康主义的结合实现的,将糖及其消费与巨大的社会、经济和环境不平等分离开来,而在这些不平等中,糖的消费以及戒糖行为才有意义。(本文的虚拟摘要可在以下网址找到:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_979cmCmR9rLrKuD7z0ycA)