Zhu Min, Yuan Cheng-Song, Jin Zhong-Min, Wang Yun-Jiao, Shi You-Xing, Yang Zhi-Jin, Tang Kanglai
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southwest Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Gaotanyan Str. 30, Chongqing city, 400038, People's Republic of China.
School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 610031, Sichuan, China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Oct 20;13(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0972-1.
Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) is recognized as the standard treatment for the end-stage ankle arthritis. Two-screw configuration fixation is a typical technique for AAA; however, no consensus has been reached on how to select most suitable inserted position and direction. For better joint reduction, we developed a new configuration (2 home run-screw configuration: 2 screws are inserted from the lateral-posterior and medial-posterior malleolus into the talar neck) and investigated whether it turned out to be better than the other commonly used 2-screw configurations.
In this study, we investigated three kinds of 2-screw configurations: 2 "home run"-screw configuration (group A), crossed transverse configuration (the screw is inserted from the medial malleolus into the anterior talus and the other from the lateral tibia maintains posterior talus, group B), and 2 parallel screw configuration (2 parallel screws are inserted from the posteromedial side of the tibia into talus, group C). The effects of the above three insertions on the loading stress of the tibio-talar joint were comparatively analyzed with a three-dimensional finite element model.
Group A was better than groups B and C in respect of stress distribution uniformity and superior to both groups B and C in anti-flexion strength and anti-internal rotation strength. Group A was slightly worse than group C but better than group B in anti-dorsiflexion and anti-valgus and varus strength.
Two "home run"-screw configuration facilitates the reduction of anterior talus dislocation of end-stage ankle arthritis. Our finite element analysis demonstrates the configuration is superior to crossed transverse and parallel configuration for arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in terms of stress distribution and initial stability.
关节镜下踝关节融合术(AAA)被认为是终末期踝关节关节炎的标准治疗方法。双螺钉固定是AAA的一种典型技术;然而,关于如何选择最合适的插入位置和方向尚未达成共识。为了更好地实现关节复位,我们开发了一种新的固定方式(2个全垒打螺钉固定方式:2枚螺钉从外后踝和内后踝插入距骨颈),并研究其是否比其他常用的双螺钉固定方式更好。
在本研究中,我们研究了三种双螺钉固定方式:2个“全垒打”螺钉固定方式(A组)、交叉横向固定方式(一枚螺钉从内踝插入距骨前部,另一枚从外侧胫骨插入维持距骨后部,B组)和2枚平行螺钉固定方式(2枚平行螺钉从胫骨后内侧插入距骨,C组)。利用三维有限元模型对上述三种固定方式对胫距关节加载应力的影响进行了比较分析。
A组在应力分布均匀性方面优于B组和C组,在抗屈曲强度和抗内旋强度方面均优于B组和C组。A组在抗背屈、抗外翻和内翻强度方面略逊于C组,但优于B组。
2个“全垒打”螺钉固定方式有助于终末期踝关节关节炎距骨前部脱位的复位。我们的有限元分析表明,在应力分布和初始稳定性方面,该固定方式在关节镜下踝关节融合术中优于交叉横向固定方式和平行固定方式。