Yuan Cheng-Song, Sun Jing-Jing, Wu Si-Ya, Jing Guo-Qing, Xie Mei-Ming, Tang Kang-Lai
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southwest Hospital, the Third Military Medical University, No. 30, Gaotanyan Street, Chongqing, 400038, China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Jan 14;14(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1034-4.
Screw fixation is a typical technique for the isolated subtalar joint. However, no consensus has been reached on how to select the most suitable insertion position and direction. This study aims to find the ideal screw insertion and then explore its influence on the clinical efficacy of subtalar fusion by analyzing the effects of different cannulated screw insertions on the stress distribution, anti-rotary strength, and anti-inversion/eversion strength of the subtalar joint.
In this study, we investigated three cannulated screw insertions for subtalar fusion: screw insertion with the most uniform stress distribution (group A), lateral-medial parallel screw insertion (group B), and traditional longitudinally parallel screw insertion (group C). The effects of these three insertions on the loading stress of the subtalar joint (including stress distribution, anti-inversion/eversion strength, and anti-rotary strength) were comparatively analyzed with the three-dimensional finite element method to screen the ideal screw insertion. Moreover, a prospective study was conducted to analyze the influence of the ideal screw insertion on subtalar fusion, including the fusion rate, fusion time, and clinical efficacy (VAS score, AOFAS score, and complications).
Group B was worse than group A with respect to the stress distribution uniformity, but slightly better than group C, and better than both groups A and C in terms of the anti-rotary strength and anti-inversion/eversion strength. The screw insertion based on the most uniform stress distribution is not feasible in surgery. Therefore, the lateral-medial antiparallel screw insertion is the ideal insertion. From January 2012 to June 2016, 48 cases were treated by subtalar fusion with the ideal screw insertion, and then followed up for 30.6 months (12-48 months). The fusion was proved in all 48 cases with a fusion rate of 100% by X-ray or CT scan. The mean time of fusion was 12.8 weeks (12-16 weeks). The VAS score decreased from 6.00 before operation to 1.03 on the last visit (P < 0.05), and the AOFAS score increased from 57.0 to 85.6 (P < 0.05), with a good and excellent rate of 95.8%.
The lateral-medial parallel screw insertion not only demonstrates a good stress distribution profile of the subtalar joint but also has advantages such as easy localization and operation during surgery, as well as a high fusion rate and few complications after surgery. Therefore, it is a safe, accurate, and effective fixation mode that is worthy of being popularized clinically.
螺钉固定是孤立距下关节的一种典型技术。然而,对于如何选择最合适的置入位置和方向尚未达成共识。本研究旨在找到理想的螺钉置入方式,然后通过分析不同空心螺钉置入对距下关节应力分布、抗旋转强度和抗内翻/外翻强度的影响,探讨其对距下关节融合临床疗效的影响。
在本研究中,我们研究了三种用于距下关节融合的空心螺钉置入方式:应力分布最均匀的螺钉置入(A组)、外侧-内侧平行螺钉置入(B组)和传统的纵向平行螺钉置入(C组)。采用三维有限元方法比较分析这三种置入方式对距下关节加载应力(包括应力分布、抗内翻/外翻强度和抗旋转强度)的影响,以筛选出理想的螺钉置入方式。此外,进行了一项前瞻性研究,分析理想螺钉置入对距下关节融合的影响,包括融合率、融合时间和临床疗效(视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)评分和并发症)。
B组在应力分布均匀性方面比A组差,但略优于C组,在抗旋转强度和抗内翻/外翻强度方面优于A组和C组。基于应力分布最均匀的螺钉置入在手术中不可行。因此,外侧-内侧反平行螺钉置入是理想的置入方式。2012年1月至2016年6月,48例患者采用理想的螺钉置入方式进行距下关节融合,然后随访30.6个月(12 - 48个月)。通过X线或CT扫描证实所有48例均融合,融合率为100%。平均融合时间为12.8周(12 - 16周)。VAS评分从术前的6.00降至末次随访时的1.03(P < 0.05),AOFAS评分从57.0升至85.6(P < 0.05),优良率为95.8%。
外侧-内侧平行螺钉置入不仅显示出距下关节良好的应力分布情况,而且在手术中具有定位和操作简便、融合率高以及术后并发症少等优点。因此,它是一种安全、准确且有效的固定方式,值得在临床上推广。