• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卢旺达首次产前检查(ANC)时的妊娠意愿和孕周

Pregnancy intention and gestational age at first antenatal care (ANC) visit in Rwanda.

作者信息

Mkandawire Paul, Atari Odwa, Kangmennaang Joseph, Arku Godwin, Luginaah Isaac, Etowa Josephine

机构信息

Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies, Human Rights Program, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.

Department of Geography, Nipissing University, 100 College Drive, Box 5002, North Bay, ON, P1B 8L7, Canada.

出版信息

Midwifery. 2019 Jan;68:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2018.08.017
PMID:30343263
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With antenatal care (ANC) coverage now widely seen as a success story in Sub-Sahara Africa (SSA), attention has begun to shift towards exploring the full life-saving potential that ANC holds.

OBJECTIVES

This study examines association between pregnancy intention and gestational age at first antenatal care (ANC) visit in Rwanda, where ANC coverage is nearly universal.

METHODS

We use survival analysis and apply the lognormal model in Stata SE 15 to compute time ratios (TR) that provide a direct metric for time to first ANC check-up.

RESULTS

Despite nearly universal coverage, only 25% of pregnant mothers start ANC within the timeframe recommended by WHO. Women with unintended pregnancies are even more likely to delay ANC (TR = 11.4%, Z = 2.48, p < 0.05) than women with intended pregnancies. The effect of pregnancy intention on time to first ANC accentuates when we control for parity in the hazard models. There is also educational divide, with early start of ANC limited to pregnant women with secondary education or higher. Interaction effects suggest significant interaction between parity (≥ 4) and unintended pregnancy (TR = 11.1%, Z = -2.07, p < 0.05) on gestational age at first ANC. Other predictors of time to first ANC are contact with health care provider and perceived barriers.

CONCLUSION

With near universal coverage, the next big challenge to harness the full life-saving potential of ANC in Rwanda would be ramping up prompt start of prenatal care, timeliness of successive checkup intervals, and adherence to recommended number of visits, as opposed to simply increasing attendance. Preventing unwanted pregnancies in multiparous mothers through family planning would also significantly to the goal of universal ANC coverage in Rwanda.

摘要

背景

产前保健(ANC)覆盖率如今在撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)被广泛视为一个成功案例,人们的注意力已开始转向探索产前保健所具备的全部挽救生命的潜力。

目的

本研究考察了卢旺达首次产前保健(ANC)就诊时的妊娠意愿与孕周之间的关联,该国的产前保健覆盖率近乎普及。

方法

我们使用生存分析,并在Stata SE 15中应用对数正态模型来计算时间比(TR),该时间比为首次产前检查的时间提供了一个直接度量指标。

结果

尽管覆盖率近乎普及,但只有25%的孕妇在世界卫生组织建议的时间范围内开始接受产前保健。意外怀孕的女性比有意怀孕的女性更有可能推迟产前保健(时间比=11.4%,Z=2.48,p<0.05)。当我们在风险模型中控制产次时,妊娠意愿对首次产前保健时间的影响会更加明显。此外还存在教育差异,只有受过中等及以上教育的孕妇才会较早开始接受产前保健。交互作用表明,产次(≥4)与意外怀孕之间在首次产前保健时的孕周方面存在显著交互作用(时间比=11.1%,Z=-2.07,p<0.05)。首次产前保健时间别的预测因素是与医疗保健提供者的接触以及感知到的障碍。

结论

鉴于覆盖率近乎普及,要在卢旺达充分发挥产前保健的挽救生命潜力,下一个重大挑战将是加快产前保健的及时启动、后续检查间隔的及时性以及坚持建议的就诊次数,而不是仅仅增加就诊率。通过计划生育防止多产母亲意外怀孕,也将对卢旺达实现普遍产前保健覆盖率的目标有显著帮助。

相似文献

1
Pregnancy intention and gestational age at first antenatal care (ANC) visit in Rwanda.卢旺达首次产前检查(ANC)时的妊娠意愿和孕周
Midwifery. 2019 Jan;68:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
2
Are perceived barriers to accessing health care associated with inadequate antenatal care visits among women of reproductive age in Rwanda?在卢旺达,有生育能力的妇女接受产前保健的次数不足,是否与获得医疗保健的感知障碍有关?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2775-8.
3
Gestational age at first antenatal visit in Namibia.纳米比亚首次产前检查时的孕周。
Int J Public Health. 2016 Dec;61(9):1089-1097. doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0885-x. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
4
Determinants of timing, adequacy and quality of antenatal care in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study using demographic and health surveys data.卢旺达产前护理的时机、充分性和质量的决定因素:使用人口与健康调查数据的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 6;23(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09231-y.
5
Assessing predictors of delayed antenatal care visits in Rwanda: a secondary analysis of Rwanda demographic and health survey 2010.评估卢旺达产前检查延迟的预测因素:对2010年卢旺达人口与健康调查的二次分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Aug 28;14:290. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-290.
6
Predictors for achieving adequate antenatal care visits during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study in rural Northwest Rwanda.预测妊娠期间获得充分产前保健就诊的因素:卢旺达西北部农村的一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jan 26;23(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05384-0.
7
Gestational Age at First Antenatal Care Visit in Malawi.马拉维首次产前检查时的孕周
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Nov;19(11):2366-74. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1754-6.
8
The timing of antenatal care initiation and the content of care in Sindh, Pakistan.巴基斯坦信德省产前护理开始的时间及护理内容。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 27;16(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0979-8.
9
Towards stronger antenatal care: Understanding predictors of late presentation to antenatal services and implications for obstetric risk management in Rwanda.加强产前保健工作:了解导致孕妇延迟接受产前服务的因素及其对卢旺达产科风险管理的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 25;16(8):e0256415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256415. eCollection 2021.
10
Determinants of poor utilization of antenatal care services among recently delivered women in Rwanda; a population based study.卢旺达近期分娩妇女产前保健服务利用率低的决定因素;一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 May 15;17(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1328-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers hindering attendance and adherence to antenatal care visits among women in rural areas in Rwanda: An exploratory qualitative study.卢旺达农村地区妇女产前检查就诊和依从性的障碍:一项探索性定性研究
PLoS One. 2025 May 21;20(5):e0323762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323762. eCollection 2025.
2
Unveiling the pathways: identifying the multifaceted determinants of low birth weight among neonates in low-income countries: a case-control study.揭示相关途径:确定低收入国家新生儿低出生体重的多方面决定因素:一项病例对照研究。
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jan 16;3(1):e001146. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001146. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Predictors of receiving care and folic acid supplementation prior to pregnancy: a large cross-sectional study in Shiraz, Iran.
孕前接受护理和补充叶酸的预测因素:伊朗设拉子的一项大型横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):824. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07041-6.
4
Perceptions of male partners on maternal near-miss events experienced by their female partners in Rwanda.卢旺达男性对其女性伴侣经历的孕产妇近死事件的看法。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 9;18(6):e0286702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286702. eCollection 2023.
5
Prevalence and risk factors for delayed antenatal care visits in Rwanda: an analysis of secondary data from Rwanda demographic health survey 2019-2020.卢旺达延迟产前保健就诊的流行情况和危险因素:对 2019-2020 年卢旺达人口健康调查二次数据的分析。
Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Feb 7;44:74. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.44.74.37570. eCollection 2023.
6
Factors associated with receipt of adequate antenatal care among women in Rwanda: A secondary analysis of the 2019-20 Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey.卢旺达妇女获得充分产前保健的相关因素:对 2019-20 年卢旺达人口与健康调查的二次分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 20;18(4):e0284718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284718. eCollection 2023.
7
Time to first antenatal care booking and its determinants among pregnant women in Ethiopia: survival analysis of recent evidence from EDHS 2019.时间到了第一次产前保健预约及其在埃塞俄比亚孕妇中的决定因素:来自 EDHS 2019 的最新证据的生存分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Dec 9;22(1):921. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05270-1.
8
Factors impacting antenatal care utilization: a systematic review of 37 fragile and conflict-affected situations.影响产前护理利用的因素:对37个脆弱和受冲突影响地区的系统评价
Confl Health. 2022 Jun 11;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13031-022-00459-9.
9
Perception of pregnant women towards early antenatal visit in Fiji: a qualitative study.斐济孕妇对早期产前检查的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 10;22(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04455-y.
10
Pregnancy intention data completeness, quality and utility in population-based surveys: EN-INDEPTH study.基于人群调查的妊娠意愿数据完整性、质量和实用性:EN-INDEPTH 研究。
Popul Health Metr. 2021 Feb 8;19(Suppl 1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12963-020-00227-y.