1 Centre for Online Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
2 Health Sciences Library, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Dec;24(10):669-675. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18800858.
Introduction The access healthcare services to inmates within correctional settings has generally been low and problematic due to specific nature of the prison setting. Telemedicine has been used as an alternative delivery mode. This study aimed to collate the current evidence related to the use of telemedicine to deliver health services within correctional settings. Methods A comprehensive search of seven databases - PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Informit, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO and Scopus, for peer-reviewed publications was conducted in April, 2018. Results Initial search identified 1147 articles. After review of the title and abstract, 36 articles were included in the final review. Of the included articles, 19 (53%) were published during the period of 2010-2018. Articles were predominantly from the USA ( n = 23; 64 %), France and Australia. There were 23 descriptive studies (64%), five costing studies (14%) five experimental studies (14%), two mixed methods (6%) and one qualitative study (3%). The experimental studies were predominantly focused on mental health services ( n = 4, 80%). The commonest telemedicine intervention used was synchronous videoconferencing ( n = 21, 58%), while eight articles (22%) described asynchronous interventions. Telemedicine interventions were mainly used for mental health ( n = 13), and ophthalmology ( n = 4) disciplines. Discussion In the right circumstances, telemedicine interventions within correctional settings seem to be a useful method in connecting inmates with essential health services.
简介 在矫正环境中,囚犯获得医疗保健服务的机会通常很低,且存在问题,这是由于监狱环境的特殊性质所致。远程医疗已被用作替代的交付模式。本研究旨在整理与在矫正环境中使用远程医疗提供健康服务相关的现有证据。
方法 于 2018 年 4 月在七个数据库(PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Informit、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册、PsycINFO 和 Scopus)中进行了全面的同行评审文献搜索。
结果 初步搜索确定了 1147 篇文章。在审查标题和摘要后,有 36 篇文章被纳入最终审查。在纳入的文章中,有 19 篇(53%)发表于 2010-2018 年期间。文章主要来自美国(n=23;64%)、法国和澳大利亚。有 23 篇描述性研究(64%)、5 篇成本研究(14%)、5 篇实验研究(14%)、2 篇混合方法研究(6%)和 1 篇定性研究(3%)。实验研究主要集中在心理健康服务(n=4,80%)。最常用的远程医疗干预措施是同步视频会议(n=21,58%),而有 8 篇文章(22%)描述了异步干预措施。远程医疗干预主要用于心理健康(n=13)和眼科(n=4)学科。
讨论 在适当的情况下,矫正环境中的远程医疗干预似乎是将囚犯与基本医疗服务联系起来的一种有用方法。