European Palliative Care Research Centre, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
European Palliative Care Research Centre, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):e588-e653. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30415-7. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
Full integration of oncology and palliative care relies on the specific knowledge and skills of two modes of care: the tumour-directed approach, the main focus of which is on treating the disease; and the host-directed approach, which focuses on the patient with the disease. This Commission addresses how to combine these two paradigms to achieve the best outcome of patient care. Randomised clinical trials on integration of oncology and palliative care point to health gains: improved survival and symptom control, less anxiety and depression, reduced use of futile chemotherapy at the end of life, improved family satisfaction and quality of life, and improved use of health-care resources. Early delivery of patient-directed care by specialist palliative care teams alongside tumour-directed treatment promotes patient-centred care. Systematic assessment and use of patient-reported outcomes and active patient involvement in the decisions about cancer care result in better symptom control, improved physical and mental health, and better use of health-care resources. The absence of international agreements on the content and standards of the organisation, education, and research of palliative care in oncology are major barriers to successful integration. Other barriers include the common misconception that palliative care is end-of-life care only, stigmatisation of death and dying, and insufficient infrastructure and funding. The absence of established priorities might also hinder integration more widely. This Commission proposes the use of standardised care pathways and multidisciplinary teams to promote integration of oncology and palliative care, and calls for changes at the system level to coordinate the activities of professionals, and for the development and implementation of new and improved education programmes, with the overall goal of improving patient care. Integration raises new research questions, all of which contribute to improved clinical care. When and how should palliative care be delivered? What is the optimal model for integrated care? What is the biological and clinical effect of living with advanced cancer for years after diagnosis? Successful integration must challenge the dualistic perspective of either the tumour or the host, and instead focus on a merged approach that places the patient's perspective at the centre. To succeed, integration must be anchored by management and policy makers at all levels of health care, followed by adequate resource allocation, a willingness to prioritise goals and needs, and sustained enthusiasm to help generate support for better integration. This integrated model must be reflected in international and national cancer plans, and be followed by developments of new care models, education and research programmes, all of which should be adapted to the specific cultural contexts within which they are situated. Patient-centred care should be an integrated part of oncology care independent of patient prognosis and treatment intention. To achieve this goal it must be based on changes in professional cultures and priorities in health care.
以肿瘤为导向的方法,其主要重点是治疗疾病;以及以患者为导向的方法,其重点是患有疾病的患者。本委员会探讨了如何将这两种模式结合起来,以实现患者护理的最佳结果。关于肿瘤学和姑息治疗整合的随机临床试验指出了健康收益:改善生存和症状控制,减少焦虑和抑郁,减少临终无效化疗的使用,改善家庭满意度和生活质量,以及改善卫生保健资源的利用。由专门的姑息治疗团队与肿瘤导向治疗同时提供的患者导向护理的早期交付促进了以患者为中心的护理。系统评估和使用患者报告的结果以及患者积极参与癌症护理决策导致更好的症状控制、改善的身心健康以及更好地利用卫生保健资源。缺乏关于肿瘤学中姑息治疗的组织、教育和研究内容和标准的国际协议是成功整合的主要障碍。其他障碍包括姑息治疗仅是临终关怀的常见误解、对死亡和濒死的污名化以及基础设施和资金不足。缺乏既定的优先事项也可能更广泛地阻碍整合。本委员会建议使用标准化护理途径和多学科团队来促进肿瘤学和姑息治疗的整合,并呼吁在系统层面进行变革,以协调专业人员的活动,并制定和实施新的和改进的教育计划,其总体目标是改善患者护理。整合提出了新的研究问题,所有这些都有助于改善临床护理。姑息治疗应该在何时以及如何提供?综合护理的最佳模式是什么?诊断后多年患有晚期癌症的生物学和临床影响是什么?成功的整合必须挑战肿瘤或宿主的二元观点,而应专注于将患者的观点置于中心的合并方法。为了取得成功,整合必须由各级医疗保健的管理人员和政策制定者来确定,然后是足够的资源分配、优先考虑目标和需求的意愿,以及持续的热情,以帮助为更好的整合提供支持。这种综合模式必须反映在国际和国家癌症计划中,并通过新的护理模式、教育和研究计划的发展来跟进,所有这些计划都应适应其所处的特定文化背景。以患者为中心的护理应该是肿瘤学护理的一个组成部分,独立于患者的预后和治疗意图。为了实现这一目标,它必须基于医疗保健专业文化和优先事项的变化。