Bradley Natasha, McConnell Tracey, Blair Carolyn, O'Halloran Peter, Prue Gillian, Lynn Fiona, Roberts Nia, Wong Geoff, Banks Elspeth, Reid Joanne
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK.
BMC Med. 2025 May 9;23(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04083-1.
Existing evidence demonstrates the benefits of integrated palliative care for people with cancer, for improved symptom burden, quality of life for patient and caregiver, and appropriate healthcare resource use. The integration of palliative care and oncology has the potential to reduce suffering and is recommended by international guidelines. However, it is not yet consistent practice. There are many approaches to integration, but it is unclear what works, for whom, and in what contexts, to achieve the best possible outcomes for patients, families, and healthcare systems.
Realist review, conducted in accordance with RAMESES quality standards. Evidence was identified through systematic academic databases searches and stakeholder engagement. Data were extracted from included articles and synthesized using realist analysis to develop explanations of how and why integrated palliative care in oncology works, for whom, and in what contexts.
One hundred sixty-four papers were included in the review, from 33 countries, and involving a range of inpatient, outpatient, and home-based care settings. Integrated palliative care and oncology could improve patient outcomes, increase the goal-concordance of patient care, and support workforce wellbeing. Interventions towards integration should be tailored to the context in which they are delivered. Ensuring the timely delivery of palliative care for people with cancer requires integration that overcomes siloes between oncology, specialist palliative care, and primary and community care. The motivation to prioritise the integration of palliative care relies upon all stakeholders first understanding its value. Enriched interdisciplinary collaboration involves developing staff skills and confidence, facilitating coordination between care settings, and supporting communication within and between teams. Leadership is needed at all levels to attend to the structural and social norms of care.
The success of integration is influenced by the ways in which palliative care is understood, prioritised, operationalised, and measured within oncology. Through the synthesis of international evidence, this project draws on implementation science to contribute clarity on how integrated palliative care and cancer care can be achieved in practice.
现有证据表明,综合姑息治疗对癌症患者有益,可减轻症状负担,提高患者及其照护者的生活质量,并合理利用医疗资源。姑息治疗与肿瘤学的整合有可能减轻痛苦,国际指南也推荐这种做法。然而,目前这一做法并不统一。整合的方法有很多,但尚不清楚哪种方法有效、适用于哪些人以及在何种情况下能为患者、家庭和医疗系统带来最佳结果。
按照RAMESES质量标准进行实证性综述。通过系统检索学术数据库和与利益相关者互动来确定证据。从纳入的文章中提取数据,并使用实证性分析进行综合,以解释肿瘤学中综合姑息治疗如何、为何有效,适用于哪些人以及在何种情况下有效。
该综述纳入了来自33个国家的164篇论文,涉及一系列住院、门诊和居家护理环境。综合姑息治疗与肿瘤学可改善患者预后,提高患者护理的目标一致性,并促进医护人员的健康。整合干预措施应根据其实施的背景进行调整。确保为癌症患者及时提供姑息治疗需要整合,以打破肿瘤学、专科姑息治疗以及初级和社区护理之间的壁垒。优先考虑姑息治疗整合的动力依赖于所有利益相关者首先理解其价值。丰富的跨学科协作包括培养工作人员的技能和信心,促进不同护理环境之间的协调,并支持团队内部和团队之间的沟通。各级都需要领导力来关注护理的结构和社会规范。
整合的成功受到肿瘤学中对姑息治疗的理解、优先排序、实施和衡量方式的影响。通过综合国际证据,本项目借鉴实施科学,为如何在实践中实现综合姑息治疗和癌症护理提供清晰指导。