School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Marie Curie Hospice, Belfast, UK.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(34):1-128. doi: 10.3310/FTRG5628.
Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death worldwide, highlighting the need for studies to determine options for palliative care within the management of patients with heart failure. Although there are promising examples of integrated palliative care and heart failure interventions, there is heterogeneity in terms of countries, healthcare settings, multidisciplinary team delivery, modes of delivery and intervention components. Hence, this review is vital to identify what works, for whom and in what circumstances when integrating palliative care and heart failure.
To (1) develop a programme theory of why, for whom and in what contexts desired outcomes occur; and (2) use the programme theory to co-produce with stakeholders key implications to inform best practice and future research.
A realist review of the literature underpinned by the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards quality and reporting standards.
Searches of bibliographic databases were conducted in November 2021 using the following databases: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, AMED, HMIC and CINAHL. Further relevant documents were identified via alerts and the stakeholder group.
Realist review is a theory-orientated and explanatory approach to the synthesis of evidence. A realist synthesis was used to synthesise the evidence as successful implementation of integrated palliative care and heart failure depends on the context and people involved. The realist synthesis followed Pawson's five iterative stages: (1) locating existing theories; (2) searching for evidence; (3) document selection; (4) extracting and organising data; and (5) synthesising the evidence and drawing conclusions. We recruited an international stakeholder group ( = 32), including National Health Service management, healthcare professionals involved in the delivery of palliative care and heart failure, policy and community groups, plus members of the public and patients, to advise and give us feedback throughout the project, along with Health Education England to disseminate findings.
In total, 1768 documents were identified, of which 1076 met the inclusion criteria. This was narrowed down to 130 included documents based on the programme theory and discussions with stakeholders. Our realist analysis developed and refined 6 overarching context-mechanism-outcome configurations and 30 sub context-mechanism-outcome configurations. The realist synthesis of the literature and stakeholder feedback helped uncover key intervention strategies most likely to support integration of palliative care into heart failure management. These included protected time for evidence-based palliative care education and choice of educational setting (e.g. online, face to face or hybrid), and the importance of increased awareness of the benefits of palliative care as key intervention strategies, the emotive and intellectual need for integrating palliative care and heart failure via credible champions, seeing direct patient benefit, and prioritising palliative care and heart failure guidelines in practice. The implications of our findings are further outlined in the capability, opportunity, motivation, behaviour model.
The realist approach to analysis means that findings are based on our interpretation of the data.
Future work should use the implications to initiate and optimise palliative care in heart failure management.
Ongoing refinement of the programme theory at each stakeholder meeting allowed us to co-produce implications. These implications outline the required steps to ensure the core components and determinants of behaviour are in place so that all key players have the capacity, opportunity and motivation to integrate palliative care into heart failure management.
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42021240185.
This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR131800) and is published in full in ; Vol. 12, No. 34. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
心血管疾病是全球最常见的死亡原因,这凸显了需要研究为心力衰竭患者的管理提供姑息治疗选择。尽管有一些综合姑息治疗和心力衰竭干预措施的成功案例,但在国家、医疗保健环境、多学科团队提供、提供方式和干预措施组成部分方面存在异质性。因此,这项综述对于确定在综合姑息治疗和心力衰竭时,哪些干预措施有效、针对谁以及在什么情况下有效至关重要。
(1)制定一个方案理论,说明为什么、针对谁以及在什么情况下会产生预期的结果;(2)使用该方案理论与利益相关者共同制定关键影响,以告知最佳实践和未来研究。
在真实主义和元叙述证据综合:不断发展的标准质量和报告标准的基础上,对文献进行真实主义审查。
2021 年 11 月,使用以下数据库对文献进行了检索:EMBASE、MEDLINE、PsycInfo、AMED、HMIC 和 CINAHL。通过提醒和利益相关者团体,还确定了其他相关文件。
真实主义审查是一种针对证据综合的理论导向和解释性方法。使用真实主义综合来综合证据,因为综合姑息治疗和心力衰竭的成功实施取决于背景和涉及的人员。真实主义综合遵循 Pawson 的五个迭代阶段:(1)定位现有理论;(2)搜索证据;(3)文件选择;(4)提取和组织数据;(5)综合证据并得出结论。我们招募了一个国际利益相关者团体(=32),包括英国国民保健制度管理、参与姑息治疗和心力衰竭服务的医疗保健专业人员、政策和社区团体、以及公众和患者成员,以在整个项目中提供建议和反馈,并与英国健康教育英格兰合作传播研究结果。
总共确定了 1768 份文件,其中 1076 份符合纳入标准。根据方案理论和与利益相关者的讨论,将这一数字缩小到 130 份纳入的文件。我们的真实主义分析制定并完善了 6 个总体背景-机制-结果配置和 30 个子背景-机制-结果配置。文献和利益相关者反馈的真实主义综合有助于揭示最有可能支持将姑息治疗纳入心力衰竭管理的关键干预策略。这些策略包括为循证姑息治疗教育提供保护时间和选择教育环境(例如在线、面对面或混合),以及提高对姑息治疗益处的认识作为关键干预策略、通过可信的拥护者将姑息治疗和心力衰竭整合的情感和智力需求、看到直接的患者受益,以及在实践中优先考虑姑息治疗和心力衰竭指南。我们的研究结果的影响在能力、机会、动机、行为模型中进一步概述。
分析的真实主义方法意味着研究结果基于我们对数据的解释。
未来的工作应该利用这些影响来启动和优化心力衰竭管理中的姑息治疗。
在每个利益相关者会议上对方案理论的不断完善使我们能够共同制定影响。这些影响概述了确保核心组成部分和行为决定因素到位所需的步骤,以便所有主要参与者都有能力、机会和动机将姑息治疗纳入心力衰竭管理。
本研究在 PROSPERO CRD42021240185 注册。
该奖项由英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所(NIHR)健康与社会保健交付研究计划(NIHR 奖号:NIHR131800)资助,并在;第 12 卷,第 34 期。请访问 NIHR 资助和奖项网站以获取更多奖项信息。