• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

邮政筛查可识别老年人的衰弱状况并预测不良结局:来自INTER-FRAIL研究的纵向数据

Postal screening can identify frailty and predict poor outcomes in older adults: longitudinal data from INTER-FRAIL study.

作者信息

Mossello Enrico, Profili Francesco, Di Bari Mauro, Bandinelli Stefania, Razzanelli Matilde, Salvioni Anna, Corridori Carla, Di Fiandra Teresa, Francesconi Paolo

机构信息

Research Unit of Medicine of Ageing, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Osservatorio di Epidemiologia, Agenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2016 Jul;45(4):469-74. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw048. Epub 2016 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1093/ageing/afw048
PMID:27013497
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

identification of older individuals at risk for health-related adverse outcomes (HRAO) is necessary for population-based preventive interventions. Aim of this study was to improve a previously validated postal screening questionnaire for frailty in non-disabled older subjects and to test its prognostic validity in a vast sample of older community-dwellers.

METHODS

individuals aged 70+ underwent a mass postal screening. Physical frailty phenotype (PFP) was assessed in the unselected subsample of the first responders. After a 1-year follow-up, HRAO were recorded in the whole sample, including survival, access to Emergency Department, hospitalisation and Long-Term Care admission.

RESULTS

the questionnaire was mailed to 17,273 subjects, whose response rate was 55%. Among the first 1,037 responders without overt disability, the revised questionnaire was 75% sensitive and 69% specific for PFP (ROC 0.772). Non-disabled subjects who screened positive had a higher risk of HRAO in comparison with those who screened negative and similar to non-responders. Risk of adverse outcome was highest among disabled subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

a simple questionnaire delivered by mail has good accuracy in detecting PFP in non-disabled older subjects and is able to predict HRAO.

摘要

目的

识别有健康相关不良结局(HRAO)风险的老年人对于基于人群的预防性干预措施至关重要。本研究的目的是改进先前验证的用于非残疾老年人衰弱的邮政筛查问卷,并在大量老年社区居民样本中测试其预后效度。

方法

70岁及以上的个体接受了大规模邮政筛查。在首批应答者的未筛选子样本中评估身体衰弱表型(PFP)。经过1年的随访,在整个样本中记录HRAO,包括生存、急诊就诊、住院和长期护理入院情况。

结果

问卷被邮寄给17273名受试者,应答率为55%。在首批1037名无明显残疾的应答者中,修订后的问卷对PFP的敏感性为75%,特异性为69%(ROC 0.772)。与筛查阴性的受试者相比,筛查阳性的非残疾受试者发生HRAO的风险更高,且与未应答者相似。残疾受试者中不良结局的风险最高。

结论

通过邮件发放的简单问卷在检测非残疾老年人的PFP方面具有良好的准确性,并且能够预测HRAO。

相似文献

1
Postal screening can identify frailty and predict poor outcomes in older adults: longitudinal data from INTER-FRAIL study.邮政筛查可识别老年人的衰弱状况并预测不良结局:来自INTER-FRAIL研究的纵向数据
Age Ageing. 2016 Jul;45(4):469-74. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw048. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
2
Screening for frailty in older adults using a postal questionnaire: rationale, methods, and instruments validation of the INTER-FRAIL study.使用邮政问卷对老年人进行衰弱筛查:INTER-FRAIL研究的原理、方法及工具验证
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Oct;62(10):1933-7. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13029. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
3
A frailty index based on laboratory deficits in community-dwelling men predicted their risk of adverse health outcomes.基于社区男性实验室指标缺陷的衰弱指数可预测其不良健康结局的风险。
Age Ageing. 2016 Jul;45(4):463-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw054. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
4
FRAILTOOLS study protocol: a comprehensive validation of frailty assessment tools to screen and diagnose frailty in different clinical and social settings and to provide instruments for integrated care in older adults.FRAILTOOLS 研究方案:全面验证虚弱评估工具,以在不同临床和社会环境中筛查和诊断虚弱,并为老年人的综合护理提供工具。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 18;19(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1042-1.
5
Predictive performance of four frailty screening tools in community-dwelling elderly.四种衰弱筛查工具在社区居住老年人中的预测性能。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 10;17(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0633-y.
6
Can resources moderate the impact of levels of frailty on adverse outcomes among (pre-) frail older people? A longitudinal study.资源能否减轻(准)虚弱老年人中虚弱程度对不良结局的影响?一项纵向研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Aug 17;17(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0583-4.
7
Frailty status at admission to hospital predicts multiple adverse outcomes.入院时的虚弱状况预测多种不良结局。
Age Ageing. 2017 Sep 1;46(5):801-806. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx081.
8
Prevalence of frailty and its association with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and resource utilization in a population of Singaporean older adults.在新加坡老年人群体中,衰弱的流行情况及其与社会人口学和临床特征的关系,以及与资源利用的关系。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Oct;17(10):1444-1454. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12891. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
9
Comparison of 3 Frailty Instruments in a Geriatric Acute Care Setting in a Low-Middle Income Country.在中低收入国家的老年急性护理环境中比较 3 种衰弱工具。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Apr;19(4):310-314.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
10
The FRAIL Questionnaire: A Useful Tool for Bedside Screening of Geriatric Trauma Patients.衰弱问卷:老年创伤患者床边筛查的有用工具。
J Trauma Nurs. 2018 Jul/Aug;25(4):242-247. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000379.

引用本文的文献

1
Frailty screening in older patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: Comparative study of seven screening instruments.择期结直肠手术老年患者的衰弱筛查:七种筛查工具的比较研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Apr;73(4):1060-1072. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19317. Epub 2024 Dec 29.
2
Prevalence and correlates of frailty in older hypertensive outpatients according to different tools: the HYPER-FRAIL pilot study.根据不同工具评估老年高血压门诊患者衰弱的流行情况及其相关因素:HYPER-FRAIL 先导研究。
J Hypertens. 2024 Jan 1;42(1):86-94. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003559. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
3
Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Values of a Postal Mail Self-Screening Tool for Frailty in French Older Adults.
邮寄自我筛查工具评估法国老年人衰弱的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。
J Frailty Aging. 2023;12(3):175-181. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2023.11.
4
Geriatric CO-mAnagement for Cardiology patients in the Hospital (G-COACH): study protocol of a prospective before-after effectiveness-implementation study.医院老年心脏病患者的共同管理(G-COACH):一项前瞻性前后对比有效性实施研究的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 21;8(10):e023593. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023593.