Langer Shelby L, Soltero Erica G, Beresford Shirley Aa, McGregor Bonnie A, Albano Denise L, Patrick Donald L, Bowen Deborah J
Arizona State University, USA.
University of Washington, USA.
Health Psychol Open. 2018 Oct 12;5(2):2055102918804664. doi: 10.1177/2055102918804664. eCollection 2018 Jul-Dec.
We examined food consumption in response to a laboratory-induced stressor (two challenging neuropsychological tasks) among non-Hispanic White women categorized as lower or higher in socioeconomic status based on education. The two socioeconomic status groups did not differ with respect to current hunger or baseline dietary habits. Perceived stress was measured pre- and post-challenge. Snacks were offered post-challenge; food consumption was measured by weighing snack bowls pre- and post-offering. Perceived stress increased pre- to post-challenge for both groups, but this effect was stronger for women lower in socioeconomic status. In addition, women lower versus higher in socioeconomic status consumed more food overall and more high-fat sweet food in particular (large effect sizes). These findings provide evidence of socioeconomic status differences in food consumption following an acute stressor.
我们研究了根据教育程度被归类为社会经济地位较低或较高的非西班牙裔白人女性,在应对实验室诱发的应激源(两项具有挑战性的神经心理学任务)时的食物消费情况。这两个社会经济地位组在当前饥饿程度或基线饮食习惯方面没有差异。在挑战前后测量了感知压力。挑战后提供了零食;通过在提供零食前后称量零食碗来测量食物消费量。两组在挑战前后的感知压力均有所增加,但这种影响在社会经济地位较低的女性中更强。此外,社会经济地位较低的女性比社会经济地位较高的女性总体上摄入更多食物,尤其是更多高脂肪甜食(效应量较大)。这些发现为急性应激源后食物消费中的社会经济地位差异提供了证据。