Mauriege P, Galitzky J, Berlan M, Lafontan M
Eur J Clin Invest. 1987 Apr;17(2):156-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1987.tb02395.x.
Investigations have been carried out to explain the heterogeneity of response to catecholamines of human fat cells from various deposits. Adipocytes from two subcutaneous sites (abdominal and femoral) were studied concomitantly in women while omental fat cells were taken from another group of patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Alpha-2 and beta sites were identified in fat-cell membranes with [3H]yohimbine and [3H]dihydroalprenolol, respectively. Lipolytic responses were tested with isoproterenol (beta agonist), clonidine (alpha-2 agonist) and epinephrine. There are clear differences in the relative number of beta and alpha-2 sites according to the origin of the fat deposit; beta sites are less numerous than alpha-2 sites in subcutaneous fat cells of both regions (alpha-2:beta sites are in a ratio of 3 +/- 0.4:2 +/- 0.4). However, in membranes of omental fat cells, beta sites are at least as numerous as alpha-2 sites (ratio 0.9 +/- 0.2). Epinephrine always has a higher affinity for alpha-2 sites than for beta sites in the subcutaneous and omental deposits. In lipolysis studies, epinephrine, in the absence of adenosine in the incubation medium, initiated an anti-lipolytic effect in femoral fat cells and promoted inhibition of lipolysis at lower concentrations in abdominal subcutaneous fat cells, the effect being reversed at higher doses; epinephrine, however, was always lipolytic in omental adipocytes. There was no striking differences in the sensitivity to isoproterenol in the various deposits. Clonidine had a higher affinity for alpha-2 sites in femoral fat cells and was equipotent in the omental and abdominal ones. Thus, the differences in the lipolytic responses to epinephrine in adipocytes from different sites are linked to a variable alpha-2 inhibiting effect (and alpha-2 site number) rather than to a modified beta driven increase in lipolysis initiated by the physiological amine.
已经开展了多项研究,以解释来自不同部位的人体脂肪细胞对儿茶酚胺反应的异质性。在女性中,同时研究了来自两个皮下部位(腹部和股部)的脂肪细胞,而网膜脂肪细胞则取自另一组接受腹部手术的患者。分别用[3H]育亨宾和[3H]二氢心得舒在脂肪细胞膜中鉴定α-2和β位点。用异丙肾上腺素(β激动剂)、可乐定(α-2激动剂)和肾上腺素测试脂解反应。根据脂肪沉积的来源,β和α-2位点的相对数量存在明显差异;在这两个区域的皮下脂肪细胞中,β位点比α-2位点少(α-2:β位点的比例为3±0.4:2±0.4)。然而,在网膜脂肪细胞膜中,β位点至少与α-2位点一样多(比例为0.9±0.2)。在皮下和网膜沉积物中,肾上腺素对α-2位点的亲和力始终高于对β位点的亲和力。在脂解研究中,在孵育培养基中不存在腺苷的情况下,肾上腺素在股部脂肪细胞中引发抗脂解作用,并在腹部皮下脂肪细胞中以较低浓度促进脂解抑制,在较高剂量时作用逆转;然而,肾上腺素在网膜脂肪细胞中始终具有脂解作用。不同沉积物对异丙肾上腺素的敏感性没有显著差异。可乐定对股部脂肪细胞中的α-2位点具有更高的亲和力,在网膜和腹部脂肪细胞中效力相当。因此,不同部位脂肪细胞对肾上腺素的脂解反应差异与可变的α-2抑制作用(和α-2位点数量)有关,而不是与生理胺引发的β驱动的脂解增加改变有关。