• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Decontamination Strategies and Bloodstream Infections With Antibiotic-Resistant Microorganisms in Ventilated Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.通气患者中具有抗生素耐药微生物的去污策略和血流感染:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 27;320(20):2087-2098. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13765.
2
Effects of decontamination of the oropharynx and intestinal tract on antibiotic resistance in ICUs: a randomized clinical trial.口腔和肠道去污对 ICU 抗生素耐药性的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2014 Oct 8;312(14):1429-1437. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7247.
3
Effect of Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract on Hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.选择性消化道去污对机械通气危重症患者住院死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 15;328(19):1911-1921. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.17927.
4
Decontamination of the digestive tract and oropharynx in ICU patients.重症监护病房患者消化道和口咽的去污处理
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 1;360(1):20-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800394.
5
Selective oropharyngeal decontamination versus selective digestive decontamination in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.危重症患者中选择性口咽去污与选择性消化道去污的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Jul 14;9:3617-24. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S84587. eCollection 2015.
6
The effects of topical antibiotics on eradication and acquisition of third-generation cephalosporin and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in ICU patients; a post hoc analysis from a multicentre cluster-randomized trial.局部应用抗生素对 ICU 患者中第三代头孢菌素和碳青霉烯类耐药革兰氏阴性菌的清除和获得的影响;一项多中心集群随机试验的事后分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Apr;26(4):485-491. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
7
Selective digestive tract decontamination and selective oropharyngeal decontamination and antibiotic resistance in patients in intensive-care units: an open-label, clustered group-randomised, crossover study.选择性消化道去污染和选择性口咽去污染与重症监护病房患者的抗生素耐药性:一项开放标签、集群分组随机、交叉研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2011 May;11(5):372-80. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70035-4. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
8
Effect of selective decontamination on antimicrobial resistance in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis.选择性去污染对重症监护病房抗菌耐药性的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;13(4):328-41. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70322-5. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
9
Selective digestive and oropharyngeal decontamination in medical and surgical ICU patients: individual patient data meta-analysis.选择性消化道和口咽去污在医疗和外科重症监护病房患者中的应用:个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 May;24(5):505-513. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
10
Cost-effectiveness of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) versus selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) in intensive care units with low levels of antimicrobial resistance: an individual patient data meta-analysis.在抗菌药物耐药性水平较低的重症监护病房中,选择性消化道去污(SDD)与选择性口咽去污(SOD)的成本效益:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 6;9(9):e028876. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028876.

引用本文的文献

1
Equity of participants in clinical trials in critical care and perioperative medicine research: a systematic review.重症监护和围手术期医学研究中临床试验参与者的公平性:一项系统评价。
BJA Open. 2025 Jul 24;15:100425. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100425. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Development and validation of a multidimensional predictive model for 28-day mortality in ICU patients with bloodstream infections: a cohort study.重症监护病房血流感染患者28天死亡率的多维预测模型的开发与验证:一项队列研究
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jul 7;15:1569748. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1569748. eCollection 2025.
3
Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in esophagectomy and the incidence of pneumonia and anastomotic leakage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.食管癌切除术中消化道选择性去污与肺炎及吻合口漏发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0325241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325241. eCollection 2025.
4
Silent Carriers, Severe Consequences: The Hidden Threat of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Colonization in Liver Transplantation.沉默的携带者,严重的后果:肝移植中耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌定植的潜在威胁
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025 Jul-Aug;15(4):102600. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2025.102600. Epub 2025 May 24.
5
Characterization of genome-wide transpositions induced by colistin exposure in multi-drug-resistant .耐多药菌中黏菌素暴露诱导的全基因组转座子特征分析
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 Jul 2;69(7):e0157424. doi: 10.1128/aac.01574-24. Epub 2025 May 19.
6
Gut integrity in intensive care: alterations in host permeability and the microbiome as potential therapeutic targets.重症监护中的肠道完整性:宿主通透性和微生物群的改变作为潜在治疗靶点
J Intensive Care. 2025 Mar 18;13(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40560-025-00786-y.
7
A review of gut failure as a cause and consequence of critical illness.作为危重病病因及后果的肠衰竭综述。
Crit Care. 2025 Feb 26;29(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05309-7.
8
Estimating the herd effects of antimicrobial prevention interventions on ventilator-associated pneumonia within ICU populations: a cluster randomized trial emulation using data from Cochrane reviews.评估重症监护病房人群中抗菌预防干预措施对呼吸机相关性肺炎的群体效应:一项使用Cochrane系统评价数据的整群随机试验模拟研究
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 Apr 2;80(4):1047-1058. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaf033.
9
Multiple-site decontamination in critically ill patients requires careful implementation.危重症患者的多部位去污需要谨慎实施。
Infect Med (Beijing). 2024 Oct 16;3(4):100142. doi: 10.1016/j.imj.2024.100142. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Selective digestive tract decontamination implementation.选择性消化道去污实施。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Oct;50(10):1688-1691. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07500-w. Epub 2024 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Selective digestive and oropharyngeal decontamination in medical and surgical ICU patients: individual patient data meta-analysis.选择性消化道和口咽去污在医疗和外科重症监护病房患者中的应用:个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 May;24(5):505-513. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
2
Notice of Retraction and Replacement: Oostdijk et al. Effects of Decontamination of the Oropharynx and Intestinal Tract on Antibiotic Resistance in ICUs: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2014;312(14):1429-1437.撤稿及替换通知:奥斯特迪克等人。口咽部和肠道去污对重症监护病房抗生素耐药性的影响:一项随机临床试验。《美国医学会杂志》。2014年;312(14):1429 - 1437。
JAMA. 2017 Apr 18;317(15):1583-1584. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1282.
3
Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia.危重症患者的口腔卫生护理以预防呼吸机相关性肺炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 25;10(10):CD008367. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008367.pub3.
4
Oral mucosal adverse events with chlorhexidine 2% mouthwash in ICU.重症监护病房中使用2%洗必泰漱口水引起的口腔黏膜不良事件。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Apr;42(4):620-621. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4217-7. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
5
The views of health care professionals about selective decontamination of the digestive tract: an international, theoretically informed interview study.医护人员对消化道选择性去污的看法:一项基于理论的国际访谈研究。
J Crit Care. 2014 Aug;29(4):634-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.013. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
6
Selective digestive or oropharyngeal decontamination and topical oropharyngeal chlorhexidine for prevention of death in general intensive care: systematic review and network meta-analysis.选择性消化道或口咽去污与局部口咽氯己定预防普通重症监护患者死亡:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 31;348:g2197. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2197.
7
Reappraisal of routine oral care with chlorhexidine gluconate for patients receiving mechanical ventilation: systematic review and meta-analysis.重新评估接受机械通气患者常规使用葡萄糖酸氯己定进行口腔护理:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):751-61. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.359.
8
Interventions to reduce colonisation and transmission of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in intensive care units: an interrupted time series study and cluster randomised trial.干预措施以减少重症监护病房中抗微生物药物耐药菌的定植和传播:一项中断时间序列研究和集群随机试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Jan;14(1):31-39. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70295-0. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
9
A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models.使用广义提升模型进行多种处理的倾向评分估计教程。
Stat Med. 2013 Aug 30;32(19):3388-414. doi: 10.1002/sim.5753. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
10
Effect of selective decontamination on antimicrobial resistance in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis.选择性去污染对重症监护病房抗菌耐药性的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;13(4):328-41. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70322-5. Epub 2013 Jan 25.

通气患者中具有抗生素耐药微生物的去污策略和血流感染:一项随机临床试验。

Decontamination Strategies and Bloodstream Infections With Antibiotic-Resistant Microorganisms in Ventilated Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Intensive Care Center and Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Medical Microbiology and Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

JAMA. 2018 Nov 27;320(20):2087-2098. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13765.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2018.13765
PMID:30347072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6583563/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The effects of chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash, selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD), and selective digestive tract decontamination (SDD) on patient outcomes in ICUs with moderate to high levels of antibiotic resistance are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine associations between CHX 2%, SOD, and SDD and the occurrence of ICU-acquired bloodstream infections with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDRGNB) and 28-day mortality in ICUs with moderate to high levels of antibiotic resistance.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized trial conducted from December 1, 2013, to May 31, 2017, in 13 European ICUs where at least 5% of bloodstream infections are caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Patients with anticipated mechanical ventilation of more than 24 hours were eligible. The final date of follow-up was September 20, 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

Standard care was daily CHX 2% body washings and a hand hygiene improvement program. Following a baseline period from 6 to 14 months, each ICU was assigned in random order to 3 separate 6-month intervention periods with either CHX 2% mouthwash, SOD (mouthpaste with colistin, tobramycin, and nystatin), or SDD (the same mouthpaste and gastrointestinal suspension with the same antibiotics), all applied 4 times daily.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The occurrence of ICU-acquired bloodstream infection with MDRGNB (primary outcome) and 28-day mortality (secondary outcome) during each intervention period compared with the baseline period.

RESULTS

A total of 8665 patients (median age, 64.1 years; 5561 men [64.2%]) were included in the study (2251, 2108, 2224, and 2082 in the baseline, CHX, SOD, and SDD periods, respectively). ICU-acquired bloodstream infection with MDRGNB occurred among 144 patients (154 episodes) in 2.1%, 1.8%, 1.5%, and 1.2% of included patients during the baseline, CHX, SOD, and SDD periods, respectively. Absolute risk reductions were 0.3% (95% CI, -0.6% to 1.1%), 0.6% (95% CI, -0.2% to 1.4%), and 0.8% (95% CI, 0.1% to 1.6%) for CHX, SOD, and SDD, respectively, compared with baseline. Adjusted hazard ratios were 1.13 (95% CI, 0.68-1.88), 0.89 (95% CI, 0.55-1.45), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.43-1.14) during the CHX, SOD, and SDD periods, respectively, vs baseline. Crude mortality risks on day 28 were 31.9%, 32.9%, 32.4%, and 34.1% during the baseline, CHX, SOD, and SDD periods, respectively. Adjusted odds ratios for 28-day mortality were 1.07 (95% CI, 0.86-1.32), 1.05 (95% CI, 0.85-1.29), and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.80-1.32) for CHX, SOD, and SDD, respectively, vs baseline.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients receiving mechanical ventilation in ICUs with moderate to high antibiotic resistance prevalence, use of CHX mouthwash, SOD, or SDD was not associated with reductions in ICU-acquired bloodstream infections caused by MDRGNB compared with standard care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02208154.

摘要

重要性:在抗生素耐药性处于中高水平的 ICU 中,氯己定(CHX)漱口水、选择性口咽去污(SOD)和选择性消化道去污(SDD)对患者结局的影响尚不清楚。

目的:确定 CHX 2%、SOD 和 SDD 与 ICU 获得性血流感染与多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌(MDRGNB)的发生以及中高水平抗生素耐药性 ICU 内 28 天死亡率之间的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:2013 年 12 月 1 日至 2017 年 5 月 31 日期间在 13 个欧洲 ICU 进行的随机试验,这些 ICU 中至少有 5%的血流感染是由产超广谱β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌科引起的。预计需要机械通气超过 24 小时的患者有资格参加。最后随访日期为 2017 年 9 月 20 日。

干预措施:标准护理是每天使用 CHX 2%的全身沐浴和手部卫生改善计划。在为期 6 至 14 个月的基线期之后,每个 ICU 随机分配到 3 个单独的为期 6 个月的干预期,分别应用 CHX 2%漱口液、SOD(含有黏菌素、妥布霉素和制霉菌素的牙膏)或 SDD(相同的牙膏和含有相同抗生素的胃肠道混悬液),每日应用 4 次。

主要结局和测量:与基线期相比,每个干预期 ICU 获得性血流感染与 MDRGNB(主要结局)和 28 天死亡率(次要结局)的发生情况。

结果:共有 8665 名患者(中位年龄 64.1 岁;5561 名男性[64.2%])纳入研究(基线期、CHX、SOD 和 SDD 期分别为 2251、2108、2224 和 2082 例)。在基线期、CHX、SOD 和 SDD 期,分别有 144 名(154 例)、1.8%、1.5%和 1.2%的患者发生 ICU 获得性血流感染与 MDRGNB。绝对风险降低分别为 0.3%(95%CI,-0.6%至 1.1%)、0.6%(95%CI,-0.2%至 1.4%)和 0.8%(95%CI,0.1%至 1.6%)。与基线相比,CHX、SOD 和 SDD 期的调整后的危险比分别为 1.13(95%CI,0.68-1.88)、0.89(95%CI,0.55-1.45)和 0.70(95%CI,0.43-1.14)。基线期、CHX、SOD 和 SDD 期的第 28 天死亡率分别为 31.9%、32.9%、32.4%和 34.1%。调整后的 28 天死亡率的比值比分别为 1.07(95%CI,0.86-1.32)、1.05(95%CI,0.85-1.29)和 1.03(95%CI,0.80-1.32),与基线相比,CHX、SOD 和 SDD 期。

结论和相关性:在中高度抗生素耐药性 ICU 中接受机械通气的患者中,与标准护理相比,使用 CHX 漱口水、SOD 或 SDD 并不能降低由 MDRGNB 引起的 ICU 获得性血流感染。

试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02208154。