Damasse Jean-Bernard, Perrinet Laurent U, Madelain Laurent, Montagnini Anna
Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289, Marseille, France.
University of Lille Nord de France, CNRS, SCALAB UMR 9193, Lille, France.
J Vis. 2018 Oct 1;18(11):14. doi: 10.1167/18.11.14.
When predictive information about target motion is available, anticipatory smooth pursuit eye movements (aSPEM) are consistently generated before target appearance, thereby reducing the typical sensorimotor delay between target motion onset and foveation. By manipulating the probability for target motion direction, we were able to bias the direction and mean velocity of aSPEM. This suggests that motion-direction expectancy has a strong effect on the initiation of anticipatory movements. To further understand the nature of anticipatory smooth eye movements, we investigated different effects of reinforcement on aSPEM. In a first experiment, the reinforcement was contingent to a particular anticipatory behavior. A monetary reward was associated to a criterion-matching anticipatory velocity as estimated online during the gap before target motion onset. Our results showed a small but significant effect of behavior-contingent monetary reward on aSPEM. In a second experiment, the proportion of rewarded trials was manipulated across motion directions (right vs. left) independently from participants' behavior. Our results indicate that a bias in expected reward does not systematically affect anticipatory eye movements. Overall, these findings strengthen the notion that anticipatory eye movements can be considered as an operant behavior (similar to visually guided ones), whereas the expectancy for a noncontingent reward cannot efficiently bias them.
当可获取有关目标运动的预测信息时,预期性平稳跟踪眼球运动(aSPEM)会在目标出现之前持续产生,从而减少目标运动开始与中央凹注视之间典型的感觉运动延迟。通过操纵目标运动方向的概率,我们能够使aSPEM的方向和平均速度产生偏差。这表明运动方向预期对预期性运动的启动有很强的影响。为了进一步了解预期性平稳眼球运动的本质,我们研究了强化对aSPEM的不同影响。在第一个实验中,强化与特定的预期行为相关。在目标运动开始前的间隙期间,在线估计的与标准匹配的预期速度会关联一笔金钱奖励。我们的结果显示行为相关的金钱奖励对aSPEM有微小但显著的影响。在第二个实验中,奖励试验的比例在不同运动方向(右与左)上进行操纵,与参与者的行为无关。我们的结果表明预期奖励中的偏差不会系统性地影响预期性眼球运动。总体而言,这些发现强化了这样一种观念,即预期性眼球运动可被视为一种操作性行为(类似于视觉引导的行为),而对非偶然奖励的预期并不能有效地使其产生偏差。