Suppr超能文献

阿莫西林/甲硝唑与阿奇霉素抗菌体外疗效比较——一项系统评价

Comparing the Antimicrobial In Vitro Efficacy of Amoxicillin/Metronidazole against Azithromycin-A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Kaufmann Manuela, Lenherr Patrik, Walter Clemens, Thurnheer Thomas, Attin Thomas, Wiedemeier Daniel B, Schmidlin Patrick R

机构信息

Clinic of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland.

Private Practice, Zahnmedizin Wiesental, CH-9100 Herisau, Switzerland.

出版信息

Dent J (Basel). 2018 Oct 20;6(4):59. doi: 10.3390/dj6040059.

Abstract

On account of its proven clinical efficacy, the combination of systemically administered amoxicillin and metronidazole is frequently adjuncted to non-operative periodontal therapy and well documented. Potential drawbacks of this regimen, e.g., side effects and problems with the compliance, led to an ongoing search for alternatives. Azithromycin, an antibiotic extensively used in general medicine, has recently found its niche in periodontal therapy as well. This systematic review aimed to analyze the in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of amoxicillin plus metronidazole versus azithromycin. For this purpose, a systematic literature search was performed, and studies published up to 29 March 2018 referenced in Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Biosis were independently screened by two authors. An additional hand search was performed and studies focusing on the evaluation of in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of amoxicillin + metronidazole or azithromycin on bacteria from the subgingival biofilm were included. English and German language research reports were considered. From 71 identified articles, only three articles were eligible for inclusion. These studies showed heterogeneity in terms of analytical methods and strains explored. However, all studies used multispecies biofilm models for analysis of the antimicrobial activity. Unanimously, studies reported on more pronounced antimicrobial effects when applying the combination of amoxicillin + metronidazole, compared to azithromycin. Based on the few studies available, the combination of amoxicillin + metronidazole seemed to display higher antimicrobial efficacy in vitro than azithromycin.

摘要

鉴于其已证实的临床疗效,全身应用阿莫西林和甲硝唑的联合用药常被用于非手术牙周治疗,且有充分的文献记载。该治疗方案的潜在缺点,如副作用和依从性问题,促使人们不断寻找替代方案。阿奇霉素是一种在普通医学中广泛使用的抗生素,最近也在牙周治疗中找到了用武之地。本系统评价旨在分析阿莫西林加甲硝唑与阿奇霉素的体外抗菌疗效。为此,进行了系统的文献检索,两名作者独立筛选了截至2018年3月29日在Medline、Embase、Cochrane和Biosis中引用的研究。另外进行了手工检索,纳入了关注阿莫西林+甲硝唑或阿奇霉素对龈下生物膜细菌体外抗菌疗效评估的研究。考虑了英语和德语的研究报告。从71篇已识别的文章中,只有3篇文章符合纳入标准。这些研究在分析方法和所探索的菌株方面存在异质性。然而,所有研究都使用多物种生物膜模型来分析抗菌活性。一致的是,与阿奇霉素相比,研究报告称应用阿莫西林+甲硝唑联合用药时抗菌效果更明显。基于现有的少数研究,阿莫西林+甲硝唑联合用药在体外似乎比阿奇霉素显示出更高的抗菌疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验