Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, and
Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, and.
Pediatrics. 2018 Nov;142(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0733. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
Successful treatment approaches are needed for obesity in adolescents. Motivational interviewing (MI), a counseling approach designed to enhance behavior change, shows promise in promoting healthy lifestyle changes.
Conduct a systematic review of MI for treating overweight and obesity in adolescents and meta-analysis of its effects on anthropometric and cardiometabolic outcomes.
We searched Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsychINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from January 1997 to April 2018.
Four authors reviewed titles, abstracts, and full-text articles.
Two authors abstracted data and assessed risk of bias and quality of evidence.
Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria; 11 were included in the meta-analysis. There were nonsignificant effects on reducing BMI (mean difference [MD] -0.27; 95% confidence interval -0.98 to 0.44) and BMI percentile (MD -1.07; confidence interval -3.63 to 1.48) and no discernable effects on BMI score, waist circumference, glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, or fasting insulin. Optimal information size necessary for detecting statistically significant MDs was not met for any outcome. Qualitative synthesis suggests MI may improve health-related behaviors, especially when added to complementary interventions.
Small sample sizes, overall moderate risk of bias, and short follow-up periods.
MI alone does not seem effective for treating overweight and obesity in adolescents, but sample size and study dose, delivery, and duration issues complicate interpretation of the results. Larger, longer duration studies may be needed to properly assess MI for weight management in adolescents.
青少年肥胖需要有效的治疗方法。动机访谈(MI)是一种旨在促进行为改变的咨询方法,在促进健康生活方式改变方面显示出前景。
系统评价 MI 治疗青少年超重和肥胖的效果,并对其对人体测量和心血管代谢结果的影响进行荟萃分析。
我们检索了 Medline、Embase、护理学及相关健康学科累积索引、PsychINFO、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆和 Google Scholar,检索时间为 1997 年 1 月至 2018 年 4 月。
四位作者对标题、摘要和全文文章进行了筛选。
两位作者提取数据,并评估了偏倚风险和证据质量。
17 项研究符合纳入标准,其中 11 项研究纳入荟萃分析。MI 对降低 BMI(平均差[MD] -0.27;95%置信区间-0.98 至 0.44)和 BMI 百分位数(MD-1.07;置信区间-3.63 至 1.48)没有显著影响,对 BMI 评分、腰围、血糖、甘油三酯、胆固醇或空腹胰岛素也没有明显影响。对于任何结局,都未达到检测统计学显著 MD 所需的最佳信息大小。定性综合表明,MI 可能改善健康相关行为,尤其是当添加到补充干预措施中时。
样本量小,整体偏倚风险中等,随访时间短。
MI 单独治疗青少年超重和肥胖似乎效果不佳,但样本量、研究剂量、干预措施的提供方式和持续时间等问题使结果的解释变得复杂。可能需要更大、持续时间更长的研究来正确评估 MI 对青少年体重管理的效果。