Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea.
Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2690-2697. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5776-5. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
To compare percutaneous temporary covered stent placement with balloon dilatation in the treatment of benign stricture of bilioenteric anastomosis.
From November 2004 to August 2017, 56 patients with benign bilioenteric anastomotic strictures underwent percutaneous transhepatic treatment. A temporary covered stent designed for spontaneous migration was placed in 23 patients (stent group). Balloon dilatation was performed in 33 patients (balloon group). The technical success, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) indwelling times, stent indwelling times and patency rates were retrospectively compared between the two groups.
Technical success was achieved in all patients in the stent group and in 96.8% (32/33) of patients in the balloon group. All stents spontaneously migrated into the jejunum, and stent indwelling times were 3-9 months (median, 6 months). The PTBD indwelling time was shorter for the stent group than for the balloon group (median, 7 vs. 71 days, p = 0.001). Recurrent strictures occurred more frequently in the balloon group than in the stent group (54.5% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.002; hazard ratio 3.7). The 1- and 3-year primary patency rates were 90.2% and 84.9% for the stent group and 75.1% and 52.8% for the balloon group, respectively (p = 0.04).
Percutaneous temporary covered stenting is an effective treatment in patients with benign bilioenteric anastomotic strictures. It provides longer patency and shorter PTBD indwelling time compared with balloon dilatation.
• A temporary covered stent designed for spontaneous migration is a feasible and effective treatment for patients with benign bilioenteric anastomotic strictures. • Percutaneous temporary covered stents provide longer patency and shorter drainage catheter indwelling time compared with conventional balloon dilatation. • A covered stent with flared ends spontaneously migrated after 3-9 months.
比较经皮临时覆膜支架置入与球囊扩张治疗胆肠吻合口良性狭窄的效果。
2004 年 11 月至 2017 年 8 月,56 例胆肠吻合口良性狭窄患者接受经皮经肝治疗。23 例患者(支架组)放置自行迁移的临时覆膜支架,33 例患者(球囊组)行球囊扩张。回顾性比较两组患者的技术成功率、经皮经肝胆道引流(PTBD)留置时间、支架留置时间和通畅率。
支架组所有患者均获得技术成功,球囊组 96.8%(32/33)患者获得技术成功。所有支架均自行迁移至空肠,支架留置时间为 3-9 个月(中位数 6 个月)。支架组 PTBD 留置时间短于球囊组(中位数 7 天 vs. 71 天,p=0.001)。球囊组再狭窄发生率高于支架组(54.5% vs. 13.0%,p=0.002;风险比 3.7)。支架组 1 年和 3 年的原发通畅率分别为 90.2%和 84.9%,球囊组分别为 75.1%和 52.8%(p=0.04)。
经皮临时覆膜支架置入治疗胆肠吻合口良性狭窄是一种有效的方法,与球囊扩张相比,它可提供更长的通畅时间和更短的 PTBD 留置时间。
自行迁移的临时覆膜支架是治疗胆肠吻合口良性狭窄患者的一种可行且有效的方法。
与常规球囊扩张相比,经皮临时覆膜支架可提供更长的通畅时间和更短的引流管留置时间。
带有喇叭口的覆膜支架在 3-9 个月后自行迁移。