1 Academic Neurosurgery Unit, St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
2 Neuro-intensive Care Unit, St. George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Mar 19;36(6):919-929. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5961. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
The effect of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) on spinal cord blood flow (SCBF) in humans is unknown. Whether intervention to achieve the recommended mean arterial pressure (MAP) guideline of 85-90 mm Hg improves SCBF is also unclear. Here, we use laser speckle contrast imaging intraoperatively to visualize blood flow at the injury site in 22 patients with acute, severe spinal cord injuries (American Spinal Injuries Association Impairment Scale, grades A-C). In 17 of 22 patients, injury-site metabolism was also monitored with a microdialysis catheter placed intradurally on the surface of the injured cord. We observed three different SCBF patterns, characterized by distinct injury-site metabolic signatures, which we term necrosis-penumbra, hyperperfusion, and patchy-perfusion. The necrosis-penumbra pattern, only observed in thoracic injuries, had a core of low blood flow (necrosis) with regions of intermediate blood flow on either side (penumbra). The hyperperfusion pattern, only observed in cervical injuries, had very high blood flow throughout the injury site. The patchy-perfusion pattern, found in cervical and thoracic injuries, had irregular regions of low, intermediate, and high blood flow. Though intervention to increase MAP by 20 mm Hg increased overall blood flow at the injury site, in 5 of 22 patients, blood flow increased in some regions, but, surprisingly, decreased in other regions. We term this phenomenon blood pressure-induced local steal. In 7 of 19 patients with MAP 85-90 mm Hg, parts of the injury site were only perfused in systole, but not in diastole, which we term diastolic ischemia. We conclude that acute, severe TSCI produces three pathological blood flow patterns at the injury site. Intervention to increase blood pressure may elicit potentially detrimental SCBF responses in some patients.
创伤性脊髓损伤(TSCI)对人体脊髓血流(SCBF)的影响尚不清楚。干预以达到推荐的平均动脉压(MAP)标准 85-90mmHg 是否能改善 SCBF 也不清楚。在这里,我们使用激光散斑对比成像术在 22 名急性严重脊髓损伤患者(美国脊髓损伤协会损伤分级 A-C)的手术中观察损伤部位的血流。在 22 名患者中的 17 名患者中,还使用放置在损伤脊髓表面的微透析导管监测损伤部位的代谢情况。我们观察到三种不同的 SCBF 模式,其特征是具有明显损伤部位代谢特征,我们将其命名为坏死-半影、高灌注和斑片状灌注。坏死-半影模式仅在胸段损伤中观察到,其特征是血流低(坏死)的核心区域,两侧为血流中等的区域(半影)。高灌注模式仅在颈段损伤中观察到,整个损伤部位的血流非常高。斑片状灌注模式在颈段和胸段损伤中均可见,其血流不规则,低、中、高血流区域均有。尽管通过增加 20mmHg 的 MAP 进行干预增加了损伤部位的总体血流,但在 22 名患者中的 5 名患者中,血流在某些区域增加,但在其他区域出人意料地减少。我们将这种现象称为血压诱导的局部盗血。在 19 名 MAP 为 85-90mmHg 的患者中有 7 名患者中,损伤部位的某些部位仅在收缩期灌注,而不在舒张期灌注,我们将其称为舒张期缺血。我们的结论是,急性严重的 TSCI 在损伤部位产生三种病理血流模式。增加血压的干预措施可能会在某些患者中引起潜在有害的 SCBF 反应。