Darzé Omar Ismail Santos Pereira, Barroso Júnior Ubirajara
Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018 Oct;40(10):599-605. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673367. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
We have evaluated the prevalence of and the motivating factors behind the refusal to provide reproductive health services and the ethical knowledge of the subject among medical students from the Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, in the state of Bahia, Brazil.
The present cross-sectional study involved 120 medical students. A questionnaire was utilized. The dependent variables were students' objections (or not) regarding three clinical reproductive health cases: abortion provided by law, contraceptive guidance to an adolescent without parental consent, and prescription of emergency contraception. The independent variables were age, gender, religion, ethical value, degree of religiosity, and attendance at worship services. Ethical knowledge comprised an obligation to state the reasons for the objection, report possible alternatives, and referral to another professional. Data were analyzed with χ tests and -tests with a significance level of 5%.
Abortion, contraception to adolescents, and emergency contraception were refused by 35.8%, 17.5%, and 5.8% of the students, respectively. High religiosity ( < 0.001) and higher attendance at worship services ( = 0.034) were predictors of refusing abortion. Refusal to provide contraception to adolescents was significantly higher among women than men ( = 0.037). Furthermore, 25% would not explain the reason for the refusal, 15% would not describe all the procedures used, and 25% would not refer the patient to another professional.
Abortion provided by law was the most objectionable situation. The motivating factors for this refusal were high commitment and religiosity. A reasonable portion of the students did not demonstrate ethical knowledge about the subject.
我们评估了巴西巴伊亚州巴伊亚医学院和公共卫生学院的医学生拒绝提供生殖健康服务的比例、背后的驱动因素以及该主题的伦理知识。
本横断面研究纳入了120名医学生。使用了一份问卷。因变量是学生对三个临床生殖健康案例的反对意见(或无反对意见):依法进行的堕胎、未经父母同意为青少年提供避孕指导以及紧急避孕的处方。自变量包括年龄、性别、宗教、伦理价值观、宗教虔诚程度以及参加礼拜仪式的情况。伦理知识包括陈述反对理由的义务、报告可能的替代方案以及转介给其他专业人员。数据采用χ检验和t检验进行分析,显著性水平为5%。
分别有35.8%、17.5%和5.8%的学生拒绝堕胎、为青少年提供避孕服务和紧急避孕。高宗教虔诚度(P<0.001)和更高的参加礼拜仪式频率(P = 0.034)是拒绝堕胎的预测因素。拒绝为青少年提供避孕服务的女性比例显著高于男性(P = 0.037)。此外,25%的人不会解释拒绝的原因,15%的人不会描述所采用的所有程序,25%的人不会将患者转介给其他专业人员。
依法进行的堕胎是最令人反感的情况。这种拒绝的驱动因素是高度的信奉和宗教虔诚度。相当一部分学生没有表现出关于该主题的伦理知识。