Massey William V, Ku Byungmo, Stellino Megan B
College of Public Health and Human Sciences, School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, Kinesiology Program, Oregon State University, 101 Milam Hall 2520 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
College of Public Health and Human Sciences, School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, Kinesiology Program, Oregon State University, 008 Women's Building, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Oct 23;11(1):755. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3861-0.
The purpose of the current study was to examine reliability and validity evidence for an observational measure of playground play during recess. Observational data of what children played at recess were collected at 236 recess sessions across 26 urban elementary schools. An inductive content analysis of children's type of play and activity engagement during recess was conducted to categorize activities. Inter-rater reliability of observations was assessed at 49 points that spanned 22 unique recess periods at four different schools. Reliability data were collected during the winter and spring seasons. A multivariate analysis of variance was conducted to examine differences in play and activity patterns between genders, and between schools implementing recess interventions (e.g., structured play environment) and schools with no recess intervention.
Results of the content analysis yielded eight playground play and activity categories, all with high levels of inter-rater reliability (ICCs > .90). Significant differences in children's play and activity patterns emerged between genders and across recess intervention conditions. Engagement in 'sports and organized activities' and 'non-engagement in play' contributed most to the separation between boys and girls, while 'non-engagement in play' contributed most to the separation between recess intervention and non-intervention schools.
本研究旨在检验课间操场活动观察测量方法的信度和效度证据。在26所城市小学的236次课间休息时段收集了儿童课间活动内容的观察数据。对儿童课间玩耍类型和活动参与情况进行归纳性内容分析,以对活动进行分类。在四所不同学校的22个独特课间休息时段的49个时间点评估了观察的评分者间信度。信度数据在冬季和春季收集。进行了多变量方差分析,以检验不同性别之间以及实施课间休息干预措施(如结构化游戏环境)的学校和未实施课间休息干预措施的学校之间在玩耍和活动模式上的差异。
内容分析结果产生了八个操场玩耍和活动类别,所有类别评分者间信度都很高(组内相关系数>0.90)。不同性别之间以及课间休息干预条件之间儿童的玩耍和活动模式存在显著差异。“体育和有组织活动”的参与以及“不参与玩耍”对男孩和女孩之间的差异影响最大,而“不参与玩耍”对课间休息干预学校和非干预学校之间的差异影响最大。