Suppr超能文献

镓放射性示踪剂中HEPES测定的快速分析方法的开发与评估

Development and evaluation of a rapid analysis for HEPES determination in Ga-radiotracers.

作者信息

Pfaff Sarah, Nehring Tina, Pichler Verena, Cardinale Jens, Mitterhauser Markus, Hacker Marcus, Wadsak Wolfgang

机构信息

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

EJNMMI Res. 2018 Oct 23;8(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13550-018-0449-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

HEPES is a favorable buffer for Ga-complexations in radiochemical laboratories. The drawback of this buffer is its prescribed limit of 200 μg per recommended application volume in the final formulation. Currently, a TLC test according to the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) has to be performed for quantification, but this analysis suffers from low reliability and reproducibility and is based on a subjective, semi-quantitative visual evaluation. In this study, the TLC method according to the Ph. Eur. and two literature-known HPLC assays for HEPES quantification were evaluated. Additionally, the development of an improved TLC method was performed.

RESULTS

The assay according to Antunes et al. provided a reasonable quantification of HEPES using HPLC. Additionally, a reliable and conclusive TLC method was developed, which facilitates quantitative analysis by means of a pixel-based evaluation. A comparison of those two methods with the Ph. Eur. TLC assay pinpoints the superiority of the HPLC as well as the new TLC assay. Furthermore, evaluation of HEPES contents using both TLC assays by 28 subjects supported the conclusion that the newly developed TLC method is clearly favorable.

CONCLUSION

The TLC method according to the Ph. Eur. provides unsatisfactory results in terms of conclusiveness and reproducibility. In contrast, a reported HPLC assay showed valid results, with the drawback of high technical effort. An optimized alternative is provided by the improved TLC method described in this work that results in reliable outcomes and additionally offers quantitative analysis.

摘要

背景

在放射化学实验室中,HEPES是镓络合反应的理想缓冲剂。这种缓冲剂的缺点是在最终制剂中,其推荐使用体积的规定限量为每200μg。目前,必须按照欧洲药典(Ph. Eur.)进行薄层色谱(TLC)试验以进行定量分析,但该分析可靠性和重现性较低,且基于主观的半定量视觉评估。在本研究中,对欧洲药典的TLC方法以及两种文献中已知的用于HEPES定量的高效液相色谱(HPLC)分析方法进行了评估。此外,还开展了一种改进的TLC方法的开发工作。

结果

Antunes等人的分析方法使用HPLC对HEPES进行了合理的定量。此外,还开发了一种可靠且结论明确的TLC方法,该方法通过基于像素的评估促进了定量分析。将这两种方法与欧洲药典的TLC分析进行比较,突出了HPLC以及新的TLC分析的优越性。此外,28名受试者使用这两种TLC分析方法对HEPES含量进行评估,支持了新开发的TLC方法明显更具优势这一结论。

结论

欧洲药典的TLC方法在结论性和重现性方面结果不尽人意。相比之下,一种报道的HPLC分析方法结果有效,但其缺点是技术难度大。本文所述的改进TLC方法提供了一种优化的替代方案,该方法能得出可靠的结果,并且还能进行定量分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cdb/6199202/df3f594e5cfc/13550_2018_449_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验