• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你为什么看着我?是因为我在说话,但主要是因为我在盯着看或者没做什么事。

Why are you looking at me? It's because I'm talking, but mostly because I'm staring or not doing much.

作者信息

Scott Hannah, Batten Jonathan P, Kuhn Gustav

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London, SE14 6NW, UK.

Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jan;81(1):109-118. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1588-6.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-018-1588-6
PMID:30353500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6315010/
Abstract

Our attention is particularly driven toward faces, especially the eyes, and there is much debate over the factors that modulate this social attentional orienting. Most of the previous research has presented faces in isolation, and we tried to address this shortcoming by measuring people's eye movements whilst they observe more naturalistic and varied social interactions. Participants' eye movements were monitored whilst they watched three different types of social interactions (monologue, manual activity, active attentional misdirection), which were either accompanied by the corresponding audio as speech or by silence. Our results showed that (1) participants spent more time looking at the face when the person was giving a monologue, than when he/she was carrying out manual activities, and in the latter case they spent more time fixating on the person's hands. (2) Hearing speech significantly increases the amount of time participants spent looking at the face (this effect was relatively small), although this was not accounted for by any increase in mouth-oriented gaze. (3) Participants spent significantly more time fixating on the face when direct eye contact was established, and this drive to establish eye contact was significantly stronger in the manual activities than during the monologue. These results highlight people's strategic top-down control over when they attend to faces and the eyes, and support the view that we use our eyes to signal non-verbal information.

摘要

我们的注意力尤其会被面部吸引,特别是眼睛,并且对于调节这种社会注意力定向的因素存在诸多争论。先前的大多数研究都是孤立地呈现面部,而我们试图通过测量人们在观察更自然多样的社会互动时的眼动来解决这一缺陷。在参与者观看三种不同类型的社会互动(独白、手部活动、主动注意力误导)时监测他们的眼动,这些互动要么伴有相应的语音音频,要么没有声音。我们的结果表明:(1)与进行手部活动相比,参与者在对方进行独白时看脸的时间更多,而在后者情况下他们花更多时间注视对方的手。(2)听到语音显著增加了参与者看脸的时间(这种效应相对较小),尽管这并非由看向嘴巴的注视增加所导致。(3)当建立直接眼神接触时,参与者注视面部的时间显著增加,并且在手部活动中建立眼神接触的驱动力比在独白期间显著更强。这些结果突出了人们对何时关注面部和眼睛的策略性自上而下的控制,并支持了我们利用眼睛来传达非语言信息的观点。

相似文献

1
Why are you looking at me? It's because I'm talking, but mostly because I'm staring or not doing much.你为什么看着我?是因为我在说话,但主要是因为我在盯着看或者没做什么事。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jan;81(1):109-118. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1588-6.
2
"Look who's talking!" Gaze Patterns for Implicit and Explicit Audio-Visual Speech Synchrony Detection in Children With High-Functioning Autism.“瞧瞧是谁在说话!”高功能自闭症儿童中用于隐式和显式视听语音同步检测的注视模式
Autism Res. 2015 Jun;8(3):307-16. doi: 10.1002/aur.1447. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
3
Eyes only? Perceiving eye contact is neither sufficient nor necessary for attentional capture by face direction.仅靠眼睛吗?对面部方向的注意力捕捉而言,感知眼神接触既非充分条件也非必要条件。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Sep;160:134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
4
A value-driven McGurk effect: Value-associated faces enhance the influence of visual information on audiovisual speech perception and its eye movement pattern.一种价值驱动的麦格克效应:与价值相关的面孔增强视觉信息对视听言语感知及其眼动模式的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):1928-1941. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01918-x.
5
Auditory noise increases the allocation of attention to the mouth, and the eyes pay the price: An eye-tracking study.听觉噪音会增加对嘴巴的注意力分配,眼睛则为此付出代价:一项眼动追踪研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 20;13(3):e0194491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194491. eCollection 2018.
6
Gaze aversion to stuttered speech: a pilot study investigating differential visual attention to stuttered and fluent speech.对口吃言语的回避注视:一项对视口吃和流畅言语的差异视觉注意的初步研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2010 Mar-Apr;45(2):133-44. doi: 10.3109/13682820902763951.
7
Gaze patterns and audiovisual speech enhancement.注视模式与视听语音增强。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Apr;56(2):471-80. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0288). Epub 2012 Dec 28.
8
Making eye contact without awareness.无意识地进行眼神交流。
Cognition. 2015 Oct;143:108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
9
Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: effects of social status and speaking.动态情境中的目光分配:社会地位和说话的影响
Cognition. 2010 Dec;117(3):319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.003. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
10
Don't be fooled! Attentional responses to social cues in a face-to-face and video magic trick reveals greater top-down control for overt than covert attention.别被误导了!在面对面和视频魔术表演中对社交线索的注意力反应表明,与隐蔽注意力相比,显性注意力具有更强的自上而下的控制作用。
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Looking at faces in the wild.观察野外的面孔。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 16;13(1):783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25268-1.
2
The Influence of Gingival Exposure on Smile Attractiveness as Perceived by Dentists and Laypersons.牙龈暴露对牙医和非专业人士所认为的微笑吸引力的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 13;58(9):1265. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091265.
3
Looking behavior and potential human interactions during locomotion.运动过程中的注视行为和潜在的人类互动。

本文引用的文献

1
Individual differences in face-looking behavior generalize from the lab to the world.面部注视行为的个体差异从实验室推广到了现实世界。
J Vis. 2016 May 1;16(7):12. doi: 10.1167/16.7.12.
2
From faces to hands: Changing visual input in the first two years.从面部到双手:头两年视觉输入的变化
Cognition. 2016 Jul;152:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
3
What Would Jaws Do? The Tyranny of Film and the Relationship between Gaze and Higher-Level Narrative Film Comprehension.《大白鲨会怎么做?电影的专制以及凝视与高级叙事电影理解之间的关系》
J Vis. 2020 Oct 1;20(10):5. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.10.5.
4
On the cognitive bases of illusionism.论错觉主义的认知基础。
PeerJ. 2020 Aug 25;8:e9712. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9712. eCollection 2020.
5
How does gaze to faces support face-to-face interaction? A review and perspective.注视面部如何支持面对面互动?综述与展望。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Oct;27(5):856-881. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01715-w.
6
Contextually-Based Social Attention Diverges across Covert and Overt Measures.基于情境的社会注意力在隐蔽和公开测量中存在差异。
Vision (Basel). 2019 Jun 10;3(2):29. doi: 10.3390/vision3020029.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 25;10(11):e0142474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142474. eCollection 2015.
4
Don't be fooled! Attentional responses to social cues in a face-to-face and video magic trick reveals greater top-down control for overt than covert attention.别被误导了!在面对面和视频魔术表演中对社交线索的注意力反应表明,与隐蔽注意力相比,显性注意力具有更强的自上而下的控制作用。
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
5
Referent expressions and gaze: reference type influences real-world gaze cue utilization.指称表达与注视:指称类型影响现实世界注视线索的利用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Apr;41(2):565-75. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000023. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
6
The dual function of social gaze.社会凝视的双重功能。
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:359-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.040. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
7
Looking while eating: the importance of social context to social attention.边吃边看:社会环境对社会注意力的重要性。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2356. doi: 10.1038/srep02356.
8
Do as eye say: gaze cueing and language in a real-world social interaction.照我说的看:现实社会互动中的注视线索与语言。
J Vis. 2013 Mar 11;13(4):6. doi: 10.1167/13.4.6.
9
What affects social attention? Social presence, eye contact and autistic traits.是什么影响了社会注意力?社会存在感、眼神交流和自闭症特征。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053286. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
10
Do the eyes really have it? Dynamic allocation of attention when viewing moving faces.眼睛真的有这种作用吗?观看动态面部时注意力的动态分配。
J Vis. 2012 Dec 3;12(13):3. doi: 10.1167/12.13.3.