• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

边吃边看:社会环境对社会注意力的重要性。

Looking while eating: the importance of social context to social attention.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2013;3:2356. doi: 10.1038/srep02356.

DOI:10.1038/srep02356
PMID:23912766
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3733052/
Abstract

Recent studies have found that participants consistently look less at social stimuli in live situations than expected from conventional laboratory experiments, raising questions as to the cause for this discrepancy and concerns about the validity of typical studies. We tested the possibility that it is the consequences of a potential social interaction that dictates one's looking behaviour. By placing participants in a situation where the social consequences of interacting are congruent with social norms (sharing a meal), we find an increased preference for participants to look at each other. Dyads who were particularly interactive also looked more at the other person than dyads who did not interact. Recent landmark studies have shown that in real world settings people avoid looking at strangers, but we show that in a situation with a different social context the opposite holds true.

摘要

最近的研究发现,参与者在现场情况下观察社会刺激的次数比传统实验室实验预期的要少,这引发了对这种差异的原因的质疑,并对典型研究的有效性提出了担忧。我们测试了这样一种可能性,即潜在社会互动的后果决定了一个人的注视行为。通过让参与者处于一种互动的社会后果与社会规范一致的情境中(共进餐),我们发现参与者彼此之间的注视偏好增加了。特别互动的二人组比不互动的二人组更多地看着对方。最近的里程碑式研究表明,在现实世界的环境中,人们会避免看陌生人,但我们发现,在具有不同社会背景的情况下,情况恰恰相反。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc92/3733052/0ab9ed75cb88/srep02356-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc92/3733052/0f342f71c1b4/srep02356-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc92/3733052/9e1d74eaa6b5/srep02356-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc92/3733052/2fd33bc52617/srep02356-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc92/3733052/0ab9ed75cb88/srep02356-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc92/3733052/0f342f71c1b4/srep02356-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc92/3733052/9e1d74eaa6b5/srep02356-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc92/3733052/2fd33bc52617/srep02356-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc92/3733052/0ab9ed75cb88/srep02356-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Looking while eating: the importance of social context to social attention.边吃边看:社会环境对社会注意力的重要性。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2356. doi: 10.1038/srep02356.
2
Selective visual attention at twelve months: signs of autism in early social interactions.选择性视觉注意力在 12 个月:早期社会互动中自闭症的迹象。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2012 Apr;42(4):487-98. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1262-5.
3
Gaze in a real-world social interaction: A dual eye-tracking study.现实世界社交互动中的注视:一项双眼追踪研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Oct;71(10):2162-2173. doi: 10.1177/1747021817739221. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
4
Human social attention: A new look at past, present, and future investigations.人类社会注意力:对过去、现在和未来研究的新审视。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1156:118-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04468.x.
5
High autistic trait individuals do not modulate gaze behaviour in response to social presence but look away more when actively engaged in an interaction.具有高自闭症特质的个体不会根据社交场合的存在来调节注视行为,而是在积极参与互动时更多地看向别处。
Autism Res. 2017 Feb;10(2):359-368. doi: 10.1002/aur.1666. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
6
Adaptation to different communicative contexts: an eye tracking study of autistic adults.适应不同的交际语境:自闭症成年人的眼动研究。
J Neurodev Disord. 2019 Apr 13;11(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s11689-019-9265-1.
7
Potential social interactions are important to social attention.潜在的社会互动对社会关注很重要。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 5;108(14):5548-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017022108. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
8
Absence of preferential looking to the eyes of approaching adults predicts level of social disability in 2-year-old toddlers with autism spectrum disorder.对接近的成年人的眼睛缺乏优先注视,预示着患有自闭症谱系障碍的2岁幼儿的社会残疾程度。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;65(8):946-54. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.8.946.
9
Rapid target foraging with reach or gaze: The hand looks further ahead than the eye.通过伸手或注视进行快速目标觅食:手比眼睛看得更远。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Jul 6;13(7):e1005504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005504. eCollection 2017 Jul.
10
Social antecedents and perceptual consequences of how we look at others.我们看待他人的社会前因与感知后果。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jan;148(1):143-157. doi: 10.1037/xge0000506.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of emotional content on social inhibition of gaze in live social and non-social situations.情绪内容对现场社交和非社交情境中目光社会抑制的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 29;13(1):14151. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41154-w.
2
Unraveling controversies over civic honesty measurement: An extended field replication in China.解开公民诚信测量的争议:中国的扩展现场复制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jul 18;120(29):e2213824120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213824120. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
3
Eye tracker as an implied social presence: awareness of being eye-tracked induces social-norm-based looking behaviour.

本文引用的文献

1
Chimpanzees share food for many reasons: the role of kinship, reciprocity, social bonds and harassment on food transfers.黑猩猩出于多种原因分享食物:亲属关系、互惠、社会纽带以及食物转移时的骚扰所起的作用。
Anim Behav. 2013 May;85(5):941-947. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.014.
2
What affects social attention? Social presence, eye contact and autistic traits.是什么影响了社会注意力?社会存在感、眼神交流和自闭症特征。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053286. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
3
Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence.
眼动仪作为一种隐含的社会存在:被眼动追踪的意识会引发基于社会规范的注视行为。
J Eye Mov Res. 2019 Aug 5;12(2). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.2.5.
4
The role of cognitive load in modulating social looking: a mobile eye tracking study.认知负荷在调节社会注视中的作用:一项移动眼动追踪研究。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Sep 16;5(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00242-5.
5
The 'Real-World Approach' and Its Problems: A Critique of the Term Ecological Validity.“现实世界方法”及其问题:对“生态效度”这一术语的批判
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 30;11:721. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00721. eCollection 2020.
6
Sensory Interactive Table (SIT)-Development of a Measurement Instrument to Support Healthy Eating in a Social Dining Setting.感觉交互桌(SIT)-开发一种测量工具,以支持社交餐饮环境中的健康饮食。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 May 5;20(9):2636. doi: 10.3390/s20092636.
7
Inferring Interactivity From Gaze Patterns During Triadic Person-Object-Agent Interactions.在三人、物体与施动者互动过程中,从注视模式推断交互性
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 21;10:1913. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01913. eCollection 2019.
8
Socially Communicative Eye Contact and Gender Affect Memory.社交性交流眼神接触与性别影响记忆。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 22;10:1128. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01128. eCollection 2019.
9
Task instructions can accelerate the early preference for social features in naturalistic scenes.任务指令可以加速对自然场景中社交特征的早期偏好。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Mar 6;6(3):180596. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180596. eCollection 2019 Mar.
10
Social attention biases in juvenile wild vervet monkeys: implications for socialisation and social learning processes.幼年野生绿猴的社会注意偏向:对社会化和社会学习过程的影响
Primates. 2019 May;60(3):261-275. doi: 10.1007/s10329-019-00721-4. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
两种登顶的途径:有证据表明,支配地位和威望是通往社会地位和影响力的两条截然不同但可行的途径。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Jan;104(1):103-25. doi: 10.1037/a0030398. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
4
Social attention with real versus reel stimuli: toward an empirical approach to concerns about ecological validity.真实刺激与虚拟刺激的社会关注度:迈向一种针对生态效度问题的实证方法。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 25;6:143. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00143. eCollection 2012.
5
Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds.视觉注意力与人类群体中的信息获取。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8;109(19):7245-50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116141109. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
6
The directional flow of visual information transfer between pedestrians.行人之间视觉信息传递的方向流。
Biol Lett. 2012 Aug 23;8(4):520-2. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0160. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
7
Mimicry of food intake: the dynamic interplay between eating companions.进食模仿:饮食同伴之间的动态相互作用。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031027. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
8
Do we act upon what we see? Direct effects of alcohol cues in movies on young adults' alcohol drinking.我们是否会根据所见所为?电影中的酒精线索对年轻成年人饮酒行为的直接影响。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2011 Jul-Aug;46(4):393-8. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agr028. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
9
Potential social interactions are important to social attention.潜在的社会互动对社会关注很重要。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 5;108(14):5548-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017022108. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
10
Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment.市场、宗教、社区规模与公平和惩罚的演化。
Science. 2010 Mar 19;327(5972):1480-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1182238.