Suppr超能文献

警觉性与认知控制:是否存在空间注意力限制?

Alertness and cognitive control: Is there a spatial attention constraint?

作者信息

Schneider Darryl W

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, 703 Third Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jan;81(1):119-136. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1613-9.

Abstract

Congruency effects in arrow flanker tasks are often larger when subjects are more alert, suggesting an unusual connection between alertness and cognitive control. Theoretical accounts of the alerting-congruency interaction differ with respect to whether and how spatial attention is involved. In the present study, the author conducted eight experiments to determine whether there is a spatial attention constraint linking alertness to cognitive control. Alertness was manipulated in color-word Stroop tasks involving stimuli that were spatially integrated (Experiments 1-3) or separated (Experiments 4 and 5), as well as in Stroop-like tasks involving spatially separated stimuli for which the irrelevant stimulus features were spatial words (Experiments 6 and 7) or arrows (Experiment 8). All experiments yielded effects of alerting and congruency, but none produced the alerting-congruency interaction typically found with arrow flanker tasks. The results suggest that there is a spatial attention constraint on the relationship between alertness and cognitive control, part of which might involve having a task goal associated with spatial information processing.

摘要

当受试者更加警觉时,箭头侧翼任务中的一致性效应通常会更大,这表明警觉性与认知控制之间存在一种不同寻常的联系。关于警觉性与一致性相互作用的理论解释在空间注意力是否以及如何参与这方面存在差异。在本研究中,作者进行了八项实验,以确定是否存在将警觉性与认知控制联系起来的空间注意力限制。在涉及空间整合刺激(实验1 - 3)或分离刺激(实验4和5)的颜色词Stroop任务中操纵警觉性,以及在涉及空间分离刺激的类似Stroop任务中操纵警觉性,对于这些分离刺激,无关刺激特征是空间词(实验6和7)或箭头(实验8)。所有实验都产生了警觉性和一致性效应,但没有一个实验产生通常在箭头侧翼任务中发现的警觉性 - 一致性相互作用。结果表明,在警觉性与认知控制之间的关系上存在空间注意力限制,其中一部分可能涉及有一个与空间信息处理相关的任务目标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验