Suppr超能文献

体外冲击波碎石术治疗胰管结石:一项观察性研究。

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic duct stones: an observational study.

作者信息

Haraldsson Stefan, Roug Stine, Nøjgaard Camilla, Novovic Srdan, Gluud Lise Lotte, Feldager Erik, Schmidt Palle Nordblad

机构信息

a Department of Gastroenterology , Landspitali - University Hospital , Reykjavik , Iceland.

b Abdominal Center K, Bispebjerg Hospital , Copenhagen , Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct-Nov;53(10-11):1399-1403. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1508611. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies suggest that fragmentation of pancreatic duct stones (PDS) using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is associated with pain relief. However, the treatment may not be effective in certain subgroups.

AIM

To evaluate predictors of pain relief after ESWL in patients with chronic pancreatitis and PDS.

METHODS

Retrospective study including patients with chronic pancreatitis undergoing ESWL for painful PDS. Analgesic use before and after the ESWL procedure was registered. We defined adequate pain relief after ESWL as 'pain-free without analgesics or with use of weak analgesics as needed'. The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (approval number: AHH-2017-048).

RESULTS

We included 81 patients (median age 58 years; 63% men; 68% alcoholic pancreatitis). Patients underwent one to seven ESWL procedures (mean 1.7). A concurrent ERCP was performed in 17%. All patients used analgesics before the ESWL procedure (68 used opioids). After ESWL, 43 still used opioids. Thirty-two patients achieved adequate pain relief. Univariable regression analysis showed that older age predicted adequate pain relief (OR 1.09;1.03-1.16; p = .002) as did location of the stone in the head or neck (OR 2.59;1.04-6.45; p = .041). In multivariable analysis, we found that the only two predictors of adequate pain relief were age (p = .002) and the location of the stones (p = .039).

CONCLUSION

After the ESWL, about four out of ten patients are pain-free without medication or able to manage their pain with weak analgesics. Age and the location of the stones may be considered when evaluating if patients are eligible for referral to ESWL.

摘要

引言

先前的研究表明,使用体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)破碎胰管结石(PDS)与疼痛缓解相关。然而,该治疗在某些亚组中可能无效。

目的

评估慢性胰腺炎和PDS患者接受ESWL后疼痛缓解的预测因素。

方法

回顾性研究纳入了因疼痛性PDS接受ESWL的慢性胰腺炎患者。记录ESWL治疗前后的镇痛药物使用情况。我们将ESWL后充分的疼痛缓解定义为“无需使用镇痛药或仅按需使用弱镇痛药即可无痛”。该研究获得了丹麦数据保护局的批准(批准号:AHH-2017-048)。

结果

我们纳入了81例患者(中位年龄58岁;63%为男性;68%为酒精性胰腺炎)。患者接受了1至7次ESWL治疗(平均1.7次)。17%的患者同时进行了内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)。所有患者在ESWL治疗前均使用了镇痛药(68例使用阿片类药物)。ESWL治疗后,43例仍使用阿片类药物。32例患者实现了充分的疼痛缓解。单变量回归分析显示,年龄较大是充分疼痛缓解的预测因素(比值比[OR]1.09;95%置信区间[CI]1.03 - 1.16;p = 0.002),结石位于胰头或胰颈也是预测因素(OR 2.59;95%CI 1.04 - 6.45;p = 0.041)。在多变量分析中,我们发现充分疼痛缓解的仅有的两个预测因素是年龄(p = 0.002)和结石位置(p = 0.039)。

结论

ESWL治疗后,约十分之四的患者无需药物即可无痛或仅用弱镇痛药就能控制疼痛。在评估患者是否适合转诊接受ESWL时,可考虑年龄和结石位置。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验