Suppr超能文献

体外冲击波碎石术后治疗大型主胰管结石的内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)时机

Timing of ERCP after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for large main pancreatic duct stones.

作者信息

Saleem Nasir, Patel Feenalie, Watkins James L, McHenry Lee, Easler Jeffrey J, Fogel Evan L, Gromski Mark A, Lehman Glen A, Sherman Stuart, Tong Yan, Bick Benjamin L

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 University Blvd, Suite UH1602, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-5250, USA.

Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9098-9104. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10467-2. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is performed to fragment large main pancreatic duct (MPD) stones in symptomatic patients. Subsequent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is often performed to clear the stone fragments. Edema of surrounding tissue after ESWL theoretically affects the ability to perform ERCP. However, the optimal timing of ERCP after ESWL is not clearly defined. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of same-day ERCP after ESWL and to determine if the timing of ERCP after ESWL affects outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of consecutive patients from January, 2013 to September, 2019 who received ESWL for MPD stones at our center. Included patients received subsequent same-day ERCP under the same general anesthesia session or later session ERCP (1-30 days after ESWL). Demographics, anatomical findings, history, and outcomes were collected. Success was defined as complete or near complete (> 80%) stone fragmentation with clearance.

RESULTS

218 patients were treated with ESWL and subsequent ERCP. 133 (61.0%) received ERCP on the same day immediately after ESWL, while 85 (39.0%) returned for ERCP at a later day (median 3.0 days after ESWL). Baseline characteristics demonstrated patients who received same-day ERCP had a higher rate of pain at baseline (94.7% vs 87.1%, p = 0.045). Main outcomes demonstrated an overall successful MPD stone clearance rate of 90.4%, with similar rates between same-day ERCP and later session ERCP (91.7% vs 88.2%, p = 0.394). Additionally, successful cannulation at ERCP, adverse events, and post-procedure admission rates were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Delaying ERCP to allow peripancreatic tissue recovery after ESWL does not affect outcomes. Same-day ERCP after ESWL is safe and effective.

摘要

背景与目的

体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)用于对有症状患者的主胰管(MPD)大结石进行碎石。随后常进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)以清除结石碎片。ESWL后周围组织水肿理论上会影响进行ERCP的能力。然而,ESWL后ERCP的最佳时机尚未明确界定。本研究的目的是确定ESWL后当日ERCP的有效性和安全性,并确定ESWL后ERCP的时机是否会影响治疗结果。

方法

这是一项对2013年1月至2019年9月在本中心接受MPD结石ESWL治疗的连续患者的回顾性研究。纳入的患者在同一全麻疗程下接受随后的当日ERCP或更晚疗程的ERCP(ESWL后1 - 30天)。收集人口统计学、解剖学发现、病史和治疗结果。成功定义为结石完全或接近完全(> 80%)破碎并清除。

结果

218例患者接受了ESWL及随后的ERCP。133例(61.0%)在ESWL后当日立即接受ERCP,而85例(39.0%)在更晚日期返回接受ERCP(ESWL后中位3.0天)。基线特征显示,接受当日ERCP的患者基线时疼痛发生率较高(94.7%对87.1%,p = 0.045)。主要治疗结果显示,MPD结石总体清除成功率为90.4%,当日ERCP和更晚疗程ERCP的成功率相似(91.7%对88.2%,p = 0.394)。此外,ERCP时的成功插管、不良事件和术后住院率相似。

结论

延迟ERCP以使ESWL后胰周组织恢复并不影响治疗结果。ESWL后当日ERCP安全有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验