Suppr超能文献

成人桡骨远端骨折采用掌侧锁定钢板与经皮克氏针治疗的Meta分析

Volar locking plating versus percutaneous Kirschner wires for distal radius fractures in an adult population: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Youlden Daniel J, Sundaraj Keran, Smithers Chris

机构信息

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Western Sydney University Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2019 Jul;89(7-8):821-826. doi: 10.1111/ans.14903. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This paper compares volar locking plates (VLPs) and percutaneous Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation for distal radius fractures in an adult population up to and beyond 12 months. The aim of this review is to compare functional and radiological outcomes along with complication rates. A meta-analysis was performed to investigate this.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. A search of major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and CINAHL) was performed up to November 2017. Prospective and retrospective studies were included. Studies were assessed for quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Meta-analysis was performed using the 'metafor' package with R.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies (five randomized controlled trials and nine comparative studies) (n = 1535) were identified. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores were statistically significant for VLP at all follow-up intervals up to and beyond 12 months. Wrist movements were statistically significant for VLP at 6 weeks. Grip strength was significantly different favouring VLP at 12 months and final follow-up. VLP provided better restoration of ulnar variance at 6 weeks, but overall radiological outcomes were similar. These results were not clinically significant. K-wires were associated with an 18% higher risk of complication but the reoperation rate was higher for VLP (4.6% versus 3.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates similar clinical functional and radiological outcomes for VLP and K-wire fixation in the short and intermediate term. There is a higher rate of overall complication with K-wires, but the increased risk of reoperation must be considered when planning surgical fixation of these fractures.

摘要

背景

本文比较了掌侧锁定钢板(VLP)与经皮克氏针(K 针)固定治疗成人桡骨远端骨折长达 12 个月及 12 个月以上的情况。本综述的目的是比较功能和影像学结果以及并发症发生率。为此进行了一项荟萃分析。

方法

采用 PRISMA 指南进行系统综述和荟萃分析。截至 2017 年 11 月,检索了主要数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)和护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL))。纳入前瞻性和回顾性研究。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。使用 R 语言的“metafor”包进行荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入 14 项研究(5 项随机对照试验和 9 项比较研究)(n = 1535)。在长达 12 个月及 12 个月以上的所有随访期间,VLP 组的上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分具有统计学意义。在术后 6 周时,VLP 组的腕关节活动度具有统计学意义。在术后 12 个月及最终随访时,握力差异有统计学意义,VLP 组更具优势。VLP 在术后 6 周时能更好地恢复尺骨长度差异,但总体影像学结果相似。这些结果在临床上无显著意义。K 针相关并发症风险高 18%,但 VLP 的再次手术率更高(4.6%对 3.2%)。

结论

本研究表明,在短期和中期,VLP 与 K 针固定的临床功能和影像学结果相似。K 针的总体并发症发生率较高,但在计划这些骨折的手术固定时,必须考虑 VLP 再次手术风险增加的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验