Duke Clinical Research Institute (K.S.P., M.F., M.N., M.F., G.M.F., C.M.O.).
Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (K.S.P., G.M.F.).
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018 Aug;11(8):e002210. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.117.002210.
Background In heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction, 2 clinical trials, the BEST (β-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial) and HF-ACTION (Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training), have reported an effectiveness interaction between the ADRB1 (β-1 adrenergic receptor) Arg389Gly polymorphism and β-blockers (BBs). HF-ACTION additionally reported a dose-related interaction of unclear origin. If confirmed and pharmacogenetically resolved, these findings may have important implications for HF with reduced ejection fraction precision therapy. We used uniform methodology to investigate BB dose-ADRB1 Arg389Gly polymorphism interaction with major clinical end points in BEST/bucindolol and HF-ACTION/other BB databases. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively designed DNA substudies from BEST (N=1040) and HF-ACTION (N=957). Subjects were genotyped for ADRB1 Arg389Gly and ADRA2C (α2C adrenergic receptor) Ins322-325Del. BB dose was defined as either no/low dose or high dose, according to total daily dose of either bucindolol (BEST subjects) or other BB (HF-ACTION subjects) standardized to carvedilol equivalents. The main outcome of interest was all-cause mortality, and CV mortality/HF hospitalization was a secondary outcome. Results Subjects in each trial had less all-cause mortality with high- versus no/low-dose BB if they had ADRB1 Arg389Arg (BEST: hazard ratio [HR]=0.40, P=0.002; HF-ACTION: HR=0.45, P=0.005) but not Arg389Gly genotype (both P>0.2). Among gene-dose groups, there was a differential favorable treatment effect of 46% for high-dose bucindolol with ADRB1 Arg389Arg versus Gly carrier genotype (HR, 0.54; P=0.018), but not for no/low-dose bucindolol. In contrast, HF-ACTION Arg389Arg genotype subjects taking no/low-dose BB had greater all-cause mortality compared with 389Gly carriers (HR, 1.83; P=0.015), whereas all-cause mortality did not vary by genotype among subjects taking high-dose BB (HR, 0.84; P=0.55). Conclusions The enhanced HF with reduced ejection fraction efficacy of bucindolol in the ADRB1 Arg389Arg versus 389Gly carrier genotypes occurs at high dose. Other BBs taken at low dose have reduced efficacy for Arg389Arg genotype subjects compared with 389Gly carriers, suggesting a greater relative treatment effect at high dose. These data support guideline recommendations to use high, clinical trial target doses of all BBs to treat HF with reduced ejection fraction.
背景 在射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HF)中,两项临床试验,BEST(β-阻滞剂生存试验评估)和 HF-ACTION(心力衰竭:一项评估运动训练结果的对照试验),报告了 ADRB1(β-1 肾上腺素能受体)Arg389Gly 多态性与β受体阻滞剂(BBs)之间的有效性相互作用。HF-ACTION 还报告了一种起源不明的剂量相关相互作用。如果得到证实并通过药物遗传学解决,这些发现可能对射血分数降低的心力衰竭精准治疗具有重要意义。我们使用统一的方法来研究 BEST(n=1040)和 HF-ACTION(n=957)中 BB 剂量-ADRB1 Arg389Gly 多态性与主要临床终点的相互作用。
方法 这是一项对 BEST 前瞻性设计的 DNA 子研究(n=1040)和 HF-ACTION(n=957)的回顾性分析。根据卡维地洛等效剂量,将 ADRB1 Arg389Gly 和 ADRA2C(α2C 肾上腺素能受体)Ins322-325Del 进行基因分型。BB 剂量定义为无/低剂量或高剂量,根据 bucindolol(BEST 受试者)或其他 BB(HF-ACTION 受试者)的总日剂量确定。主要观察终点为全因死亡率,次要观察终点为心血管死亡率/心力衰竭住院率。
结果 在 BEST 中,与无/低剂量 BB 相比,高剂量 BB 对 ADRB1 Arg389Arg 受试者的全因死亡率有更好的治疗效果(HR=0.40,P=0.002),但对 Arg389Gly 基因型没有更好的治疗效果(均 P>0.2)。在基因剂量组中,与 Arg389Gly 携带者相比,高剂量 bucindolol 对 ADRB1 Arg389Arg 基因型受试者的治疗效果有 46%的差异(HR,0.54;P=0.018),但对无/低剂量 bucindolol 没有差异。相比之下,HF-ACTION 中 Arg389Arg 基因型受试者服用无/低剂量 BB 的全因死亡率高于 Arg389Gly 携带者(HR,1.83;P=0.015),而服用高剂量 BB 的受试者全因死亡率则与基因型无关(HR,0.84;P=0.55)。
结论 在 ADRB1 Arg389Arg 与 389Gly 携带者基因型中,bucindolol 治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭的疗效增强,发生在高剂量时。低剂量服用其他 BB 对 Arg389Arg 基因型受试者的疗效降低,与 389Gly 携带者相比,提示高剂量时治疗效果相对更好。这些数据支持指南建议使用所有 BB 的高、临床试验目标剂量来治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭。