Suppr超能文献

在门诊临床样本中检查 BVMT-R 内的最佳嵌入式 PVTs。

Examination of optimal embedded PVTs within the BVMT-R in an outpatient clinical sample.

机构信息

a University of Kansas School of Medicine , Wichita , KS , USA.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 May;33(4):732-742. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1501096. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether indices within the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) could function as embedded performance validity measures in an outpatient clinical sample.

METHOD

A sample of 138 neuropsychological outpatients was utilized; approximately 45% had a known or suspected external incentive. Patients were determined to be valid performers if they passed all criterion performance validity tests (PVTs) and determined to be invalid performers if they failed two or more PVTs. BVMT-R indices met criteria for optimal embedded PVTs if they were not significantly correlated with genuine cognitive dysfunction and if they adequately differentiated the validly from invalidly performing patient groups. Classification accuracy statistics for the indices were then calculated. Supplementary analyses were also calculated for a separate dementia sample.

RESULTS

Recognition Hits and Recognition Discrimination were identified as two optimal embedded PVTs for patients without dementia. Recognition Hits showed a sensitivity rate of 41% and a specificity rate of 95%. Recognition Discrimination showed a sensitivity rate of 54% and a specificity rate of 93%.

CONCLUSION

Embedded BVMT-R PVTs are discussed in relation to previous research findings, which were obtained from veteran samples. Recognition Hits and Recognition Discrimination are now validated in a non-veteran clinical sample.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨简明视觉空间记忆测验修订版(BVMT-R)中的指标是否可以作为门诊临床样本中的嵌入式绩效有效性衡量标准。

方法

本研究使用了 138 名神经心理门诊患者作为样本;其中约 45%有已知或疑似的外部激励。如果患者通过所有标准绩效有效性测试(PVT),则被视为有效表现者;如果患者未通过两个或更多 PVT,则被视为无效表现者。如果 BVMT-R 指数与真正的认知功能障碍无显著相关性,并且能够充分区分有效和无效表现的患者群体,则认为该指数符合最佳嵌入式 PVT 标准。然后计算指数的分类准确性统计数据。还针对单独的痴呆症样本进行了补充分析。

结果

识别命中和识别区分被确定为无痴呆症患者的两个最佳嵌入式 PVT。识别命中的敏感性率为 41%,特异性率为 95%。识别区分的敏感性率为 54%,特异性率为 93%。

结论

嵌入式 BVMT-R PVT 与之前从退伍军人样本中获得的研究结果进行了讨论。识别命中和识别区分现在在非退伍军人临床样本中得到了验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验