Suppr超能文献

评估多发性硬化症患者神经心理学评估中所选基于记忆的嵌入式表现效度测试的临床效用。

Examining the Clinical Utility of Selected Memory-Based Embedded Performance Validity Tests in Neuropsychological Assessment of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

作者信息

Lace John W, Merz Zachary C, Galioto Rachel

机构信息

Neurological Institute, Section of Neuropsychology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.

LeBauer Department of Neurology, The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital, Greensboro, NC 27401, USA.

出版信息

Neurol Int. 2021 Sep 23;13(4):477-486. doi: 10.3390/neurolint13040047.

Abstract

Within the neuropsychological assessment, clinicians are responsible for ensuring the validity of obtained cognitive data. As such, increased attention is being paid to performance validity in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Experts have proposed batteries of neuropsychological tests for use in this population, though none contain recommendations for standalone performance validity tests (PVTs). The California Verbal Learning Test, Second Edition (CVLT-II) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test, Revised (BVMT-R)-both of which are included in the aforementioned recommended neuropsychological batteries-include previously validated embedded PVTs (which offer some advantages, including expedience and reduced costs), with no prior work exploring their utility in pwMS. The purpose of the present study was to determine the potential clinical utility of embedded PVTs to detect the signal of non-credibility as operationally defined by below criterion standalone PVT performance. One hundred thirty-three (133) patients ( age = 48.28; 76.7% women; 85.0% White) with MS were referred for neuropsychological assessment at a large, Midwestern academic medical center. Patients were placed into "credible" ( = 100) or "noncredible" ( = 33) groups based on a standalone PVT criterion. Classification statistics for four CVLT-II and BVMT-R PVTs of interest in isolation were poor (AUCs = 0.58-0.62). Several arithmetic and logistic regression-derived multivariate formulas were calculated, all of which similarly demonstrated poor discriminability (AUCs = 0.61-0.64). Although embedded PVTs may arguably maximize efficiency and minimize test burden in pwMS, common ones in the CVLT-II and BVMT-R may not be psychometrically appropriate, sufficiently sensitive, nor substitutable for standalone PVTs in this population. Clinical neuropsychologists who evaluate such patients are encouraged to include standalone PVTs in their assessment batteries to ensure that clinical care conclusions drawn from neuropsychological data are valid.

摘要

在神经心理学评估中,临床医生负责确保所获认知数据的有效性。因此,多发性硬化症患者(pwMS)的表现有效性受到了更多关注。专家们已经提出了一系列用于该人群的神经心理学测试组合,不过没有一个包含独立表现有效性测试(PVT)的建议。《加利福尼亚言语学习测试第二版》(CVLT-II)和《修订版简短视觉空间记忆测试》(BVMT-R)——这两者都包含在上述推荐的神经心理学测试组合中——包含先前已验证的嵌入式PVT(具有一些优势,包括便利性和成本降低),但之前没有研究探索它们在pwMS中的效用。本研究的目的是确定嵌入式PVT在检测低于标准独立PVT表现所定义的不可信信号方面的潜在临床效用。133名患有多发性硬化症的患者(年龄 = 48.28岁;76.7%为女性;85.0%为白人)被转介到中西部一家大型学术医疗中心进行神经心理学评估。根据独立PVT标准,患者被分为“可信”(n = 100)或“不可信”(n = 33)组。单独对四个感兴趣的CVLT-II和BVMT-R PVT进行分类统计时表现不佳(曲线下面积[AUCs]=0.58 - 0.62)。计算了几个算术和逻辑回归推导的多变量公式,所有这些公式同样显示出较差的辨别能力(AUCs = 0.61 - 0.64)。尽管嵌入式PVT在pwMS中可以说是能最大限度地提高效率并最小化测试负担,但CVLT-II和BVMT-R中常见的嵌入式PVT在心理测量学上可能不合适,不够敏感,也不能替代该人群中的独立PVT。鼓励评估此类患者的临床神经心理学家在其评估组合中纳入独立PVT,以确保从神经心理学数据得出的临床护理结论是有效的。

相似文献

2
Nonmemory Composite Embedded Performance Validity Formulas in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Feb 23;37(2):309-321. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acab066.
5
The impact of race and other demographic factors on the false positive rates of five embedded Performance Validity Tests (PVTs) in a Veteran sample.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2024 Feb;46(1):25-35. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2024.2314737. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
7
Embedded performance validity tests within the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Jan;31(1):207-218. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1245787. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
9
Examination of optimal embedded PVTs within the BVMT-R in an outpatient clinical sample.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 May;33(4):732-742. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1501096. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis: Educational Level as a Protective Factor.
Neurol Int. 2021 Jul 22;13(3):335-342. doi: 10.3390/neurolint13030034.
2
Performance validity in outpatients with multiple sclerosis and cognitive complaints.
Mult Scler. 2022 Apr;28(4):642-653. doi: 10.1177/13524585211025780. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
4
Neuroimaging Correlates of Cognitive Dysfunction in Adults with Multiple Sclerosis.
Brain Sci. 2021 Mar 9;11(3):346. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11030346.
5
Feigning ADHD and stimulant misuse among Dutch university students.
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2021 Jul;128(7):1079-1084. doi: 10.1007/s00702-020-02296-7. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
6
Victoria Symptom Validity Test: A Systematic Review and Cross-Validation Study.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2021 Jun;31(2):331-348. doi: 10.1007/s11065-021-09477-5. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
7
Valid or not: A critique of Graver and Green.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Jul-Aug;29(4):639-642. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1798961. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
9
Misleading conclusions about word memory test results in multiple sclerosis (MS) by Loring and Goldstein (2019).
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 May-Jun;29(3):315-323. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1748035. Epub 2020 May 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验