Suppr超能文献

远程皮肤病学:存储转发与实时交互式视频会议的比较

Teledermatology: Comparison of Store-and-Forward Versus Live Interactive Video Conferencing.

作者信息

Brinker Titus Josef, Hekler Achim, von Kalle Christof, Schadendorf Dirk, Esser Stefan, Berking Carola, Zacher Martina T, Sondermann Wiebke, Grabe Niels, Steeb Theresa, Utikal Jochen Sven, French Lars E, Enk Alexander H

机构信息

Department of Translational Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 24;20(10):e11871. doi: 10.2196/11871.

Abstract

A decreasing number of dermatologists and an increasing number of patients in Western countries have led to a relative lack of clinicians providing expert dermatologic care. This, in turn, has prolonged wait times for patients to be examined, putting them at risk. Store-and-forward teledermatology improves patient access to dermatologists through asynchronous consultations, reducing wait times to obtain a consultation. However, live video conferencing as a synchronous service is also frequently used by practitioners because it allows immediate interaction between patient and physician. This raises the question of which of the two approaches is superior in terms of quality of care and convenience. There are pros and cons for each in terms of technical requirements and features. This viewpoint compares the two techniques based on a literature review and a clinical perspective to help dermatologists assess the value of teledermatology and determine which techniques would be valuable in their practice.

摘要

西方国家皮肤科医生数量的减少以及患者数量的增加,导致提供专业皮肤科护理的临床医生相对短缺。这反过来又延长了患者的检查等待时间,使他们面临风险。存储转发远程皮肤病学通过异步咨询改善了患者与皮肤科医生的接触,减少了获得咨询的等待时间。然而,实时视频会议作为一种同步服务也经常被从业者使用,因为它允许患者和医生之间立即互动。这就引出了一个问题:就护理质量和便利性而言,这两种方法哪种更优越。在技术要求和功能方面,每种方法都有优缺点。本文观点基于文献综述和临床视角对这两种技术进行比较,以帮助皮肤科医生评估远程皮肤病学的价值,并确定哪些技术在他们的实践中具有价值。

相似文献

2
Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Teledermatology.患者和提供者对远程皮肤病学的满意度。
Telemed J E Health. 2017 Aug;23(8):684-690. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0192. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
6
Teledermatology in the times of COVID-19 - a systematic review.COVID-19 时代的远程皮肤病学 - 系统评价。
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2020 Aug;18(8):841-845. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14180. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
10
Pediatric teledermatology: A review of the literature.儿科远程皮肤病学:文献综述
Pediatr Dermatol. 2021 Jan;38(1):39-44. doi: 10.1111/pde.14479. Epub 2020 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

8
Inpatient Teledermatology: a Review.住院患者远程皮肤病学:综述
Curr Dermatol Rep. 2022;11(2):52-59. doi: 10.1007/s13671-022-00360-x. Epub 2022 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Praxis der Teledermatologie.远程皮肤病学实践。
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2018 Jul;16 Suppl 5:6-57. doi: 10.1111/ddg.13512.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验