Suppr超能文献

保加利亚患者和消费者药品不良反应报告的经验——回顾性数据库研究

Bulgarian Experience with Adverse Drug Reaction Reports from Patients and Consumers - Retrospective Data-base Study.

作者信息

Getova Violeta I, Georgiev Stanislav R, Stoimenova Assena H, Petkova-Georgieva Elina S

机构信息

Bulgarian Drug Agency, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2018 Sep 1;60(3):447-453. doi: 10.2478/folmed-2018-0016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2012, in compliance with the changes in the European legislation, the Bulgarian Drug Agency (BDA) has been receiving adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports directly from patients as well as from healthcare professionals and marketing authorization holders (MAH). Adverse reaction reports from patients and consumers have different characteristics from those sent by healthcare professionals. Moreover, they may require specific algorithm and assessment methods in order to be informative and beneficial to the pharmacovigilance system.

AIM

The study aims to analyze the data-base of consumer reports in Bulgaria in order to distinguish and classify the main characteristics of the ADR reports from non-healthcare professionals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In-depth analysis of the Bulgarian data-base of consumer ADR reports for 2012-2016 was conducted. The criteria include patient demographic characteristics, preferred method of reporting, seriousness and expectedness criteria and most frequently reported pharmacological groups.

RESULTS

The data showed the current trends in patient reporting in the country. It also marked new courses for development of the spontaneous reporting system and collection of safety data. The analysis of the data-base showed a rather stable level of patient reporting with a tendency for constant growth every year. Bulgaria follows the world tendencies for high number of reports for insufficiently studied ADRs which meet the seriousness criteria. The review of the most frequently reported ATC codes could lead to the conclusion that the current pharmacovigi-lance methods are not sensitive enough for specific groups of medicines.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from the conducted study confirm the importance of patient reporting as a valuable source of information on adverse drug reactions. Moreover, it draws the attention to the lack of more sensitive methods for evaluation of drug safety in specific pharmacological groups. Maintenance of consumer-friendly ADR reporting system and innovative assessment algorithms should be the future directions for development in post-marketing surveillance.

摘要

背景

自2012年起,保加利亚药品管理局(BDA)根据欧洲法规的变化,开始直接接收来自患者、医疗保健专业人员和上市许可持有人(MAH)的药品不良反应(ADR)报告。患者和消费者的不良反应报告与医疗保健专业人员提交的报告具有不同的特征。此外,为了使报告具有信息价值并对药物警戒系统有益,可能需要特定的算法和评估方法。

目的

本研究旨在分析保加利亚消费者报告数据库,以区分和分类非医疗保健专业人员提交的ADR报告的主要特征。

材料与方法

对2012 - 2016年保加利亚消费者ADR报告数据库进行深入分析。分析标准包括患者人口统计学特征、首选报告方式、严重程度和预期性标准以及最常报告的药理组。

结果

数据显示了该国患者报告的当前趋势。它还为自发报告系统的发展和安全数据的收集指明了新方向。数据库分析表明患者报告水平相当稳定,且每年有持续增长的趋势。保加利亚与世界趋势一致,即针对符合严重程度标准但研究不足的ADR有大量报告。对最常报告的ATC代码的审查可得出结论,当前的药物警戒方法对特定药物组的敏感度不够。

结论

本研究结果证实了患者报告作为药品不良反应重要信息来源的重要性。此外,它还提请注意在评估特定药理组药物安全性方面缺乏更敏感的方法。维持方便消费者的ADR报告系统和创新评估算法应是上市后监测未来的发展方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验