Asriqah Lia, Nugroho Rudy Agung, Aryani Retno
Animal Physiology, Development, and Molecular Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, 75123, Indonesia.
Animal anatomy and Microtechnique Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, 75123, Indonesia.
F1000Res. 2018 Sep 14;7:1465. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15954.1. eCollection 2018.
The purpose of the current study was to determine the growth status, survival and feed utilization of catfish ( BURCHELL, 1822) fed various organic acid supplementations. In total, 1600 fish were randomly distributed into 20 tanks and fed different types of diet: A, control diet without organic acid supplementation; B, control diet supplemented with 0.05% formic, acetic, and propionic acid; C, control diet supplemented with 0.1% formic, acetic, and propionic acid; D, control diet supplemented with 0.05% butyric acid; E, control diet supplemented with 0.01% butyric acid. The control diet was a commercial diet, containing 35% crude protein, 8.58% crude fat, and 2.75% fibre. All fish were fed using a satiation method, three times per day for 56 days. At the end of the trial, growth, survival and feed utilization were determined. Water quality parameters during the trial were also measured once a week. Fish fed diet type D had the significantly lowest ( ) final weight (FW), weight gain (WG), and specific growth rate (SGR) of all diets. Similar FW, WG, and SGR were found for fish fed diets A-C and E. Meanwhile, the feed conversion ratio, feed efficiency, and survival rate of fish were not affected by any types of diet. The water quality parameters were not significantly different between tanks and weeks: dissolved oxygen 6.79-6.81 mg L , pH 7.11-7.19, water temperature 28.97-29.32°C, nitrite (NO ) content 0.48- 0.50 mg L , and ammonia (NH ) content 0.064-0.066 mg L . The supplementation of 0.05% butyric acid in the diet of for 56 days reduced the growth performance of the fish. However, supplementation of an organic acid in the diet of had no impact on feed utilization, survival, and water quality parameters.
本研究的目的是确定投喂不同有机酸补充剂的鲶鱼(BURCHELL,1822)的生长状况、存活率和饲料利用率。总共1600尾鱼被随机分配到20个水箱中,并投喂不同类型的饲料:A,不添加有机酸的对照饲料;B,添加0.05%甲酸、乙酸和丙酸的对照饲料;C,添加0.1%甲酸、乙酸和丙酸的对照饲料;D,添加0.05%丁酸的对照饲料;E,添加0.01%丁酸的对照饲料。对照饲料是一种商业饲料,含有35%的粗蛋白、8.58%的粗脂肪和2.75%的纤维。所有鱼均采用饱食法投喂,每天3次,持续56天。试验结束时,测定生长、存活和饲料利用率。试验期间的水质参数也每周测量一次。投喂D型饲料的鱼在所有饲料中最终体重(FW)、增重(WG)和特定生长率(SGR)显著最低。投喂A - C型饲料和E型饲料的鱼的FW、WG和SGR相似。同时,鱼的饲料转化率、饲料效率和存活率不受任何饲料类型的影响。水箱之间和各周之间的水质参数无显著差异:溶解氧6.79 - 6.81 mg/L,pH值7.11 - 7.19,水温28.97 - 29.32°C,亚硝酸盐(NO)含量0.48 - 0.50 mg/L,氨(NH)含量0.064 - 0.066 mg/L。在鲶鱼饲料中添加0.05%丁酸56天会降低鱼的生长性能。然而,在鲶鱼饲料中添加有机酸对饲料利用率、存活率和水质参数没有影响。