García-Pinillos Felipe, Párraga-Montilla Juan A, Soto-Hermoso Víctor M, Latorre-Román Pedro A
Department of Corporal Expression, University of Jaen, Jaen 23071, Spain.
Department of Sports Sciences, University of Granada, Granada 18071, Spain.
J Sport Health Sci. 2016 Dec;5(4):430-436. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
This study aimed to describe the acute effects of 2 different high-intensity intermittent trainings (HIITs) on postural control, countermovement jump (CMJ), squat jump (SJ), and stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) utilisation, and to compare the changes induced by both protocols in those variables in endurance runners.
Eighteen recreationally trained endurance runners participated in this study and were tested on 2 occasions: 10 runs of 400 m with 90 s recovery between running bouts (10 × 400 m), and 40 runs of 100 m with 30 s recovery between runs (40 × 100 m). Heart rate was monitored during both HIITs; blood lactate accumulation and rate of perceived exertion were recorded after both protocols. Vertical jump ability (CMJ and SJ) and SSC together with postural control were also controlled during both HIITs.
Repeated measures analysis revealed a significant improvement in CMJ and SJ during 10 × 400 m (<0.05), whilst no significant changes were observed during 40 × 100 m. Indexes related to SSC did not experience significant changes during any of the protocols. As for postural control, no significant changes were observed in the 40 × 100 m protocol, whilst significant impairments were observed during the 10 × 400 m protocol (<0.05).
A protocol with a higher number of shorter runs (40 × 100 m) induced different changes in those neuromuscular parameters than those with fewer and longer runs (10 × 400 m). Whereas the 40 × 100 m protocol did not cause any significant changes in vertical jump ability, postural control or SSC utilisation, the 10 × 400 m protocol impaired postural control and caused improvements in vertical jumping tests.
本研究旨在描述两种不同的高强度间歇训练(HIIT)对姿势控制、反向移动跳跃(CMJ)、深蹲跳(SJ)和拉长缩短周期(SSC)利用的急性影响,并比较这两种训练方案对耐力跑者这些变量的影响。
18名经过休闲训练的耐力跑者参与了本研究,并进行了两次测试:进行10组400米跑,每组跑之间休息90秒(10×400米),以及进行40组100米跑,每组跑之间休息30秒(40×100米)。在两种HIIT期间监测心率;在两种训练方案后记录血乳酸积累和主观用力程度。在两种HIIT期间还控制了垂直跳跃能力(CMJ和SJ)、SSC以及姿势控制。
重复测量分析显示,在10×400米跑期间CMJ和SJ有显著改善(<0.05),而在40×100米跑期间未观察到显著变化。在任何一种训练方案中,与SSC相关的指标均未发生显著变化。至于姿势控制,在40×100米训练方案中未观察到显著变化,而在10×400米训练方案中观察到显著损害(<0.05)。
与较少且较长距离的跑步(10×400米)相比,较多且较短距离的跑步(40×100米)训练方案在这些神经肌肉参数上引起了不同的变化。40×100米训练方案在垂直跳跃能力、姿势控制或SSC利用方面未引起任何显著变化,而10×400米训练方案损害了姿势控制并在垂直跳跃测试中带来了改善。