Mishra Aarti, Brinton Roberta D
Titus Family Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Center for Innovation in Brain Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2018 Oct 9;10:312. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00312. eCollection 2018.
Neuro-inflammatory processes that contribute to development of Alzheimer's are evident early in the latent prodromal phase and worsen during the course of the disease. Despite substantial mechanistic and clinical evidence of inflammation, therapeutic approaches targeting inflammation have failed to alter the course of the disease. Disparate results from epidemiological and clinical trials targeting inflammation, highlight the complexity of the inflammatory process. Herein we review the dynamics of the inflammatory process across aging, midlife endocrine transitions, and the APOEε4 genotype and their contribution to progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We discuss the chronic inflammatory processes that are activated during midlife chronological and endocrine aging, which ultimately limit the clearance capacity of microglia and lead to immune senescence. Aging, menopause, and APOEε4 combine the three hits of a compromised bioenergetic system of menopause with the chronic low grade innate inflammation of aging with the APOEε4 dyslipidemia and adaptive immune response. The inflammatory immune response is the unifying factor that bridges across each of the risk factors for AD. Immune system regulators that are specific to stage of disease and inflammatory phenotype would provide a therapeutic strategy to disconnect the bridge that drives disease. Outcomes of this analysis provide plausible mechanisms underlying failed clinical trials of anti-inflammatory agents in Alzheimer's patients. Further, they highlight the need for stratifying AD clinical trial cohorts based on inflammatory phenotype. Combination therapies that include targeted use of anti-inflammatory agent's specific to the immune phenotype are considered.
导致阿尔茨海默病发生的神经炎症过程在潜在前驱期早期就很明显,并在疾病过程中恶化。尽管有大量关于炎症的机制和临床证据,但针对炎症的治疗方法未能改变疾病进程。针对炎症的流行病学和临床试验结果参差不齐,凸显了炎症过程的复杂性。在此,我们综述了衰老、中年内分泌转变和APOEε4基因型过程中炎症过程的动态变化及其对阿尔茨海默病(AD)进展的影响。我们讨论了中年按时间顺序和内分泌衰老过程中激活的慢性炎症过程,这些过程最终限制了小胶质细胞的清除能力并导致免疫衰老。衰老、更年期和APOEε4将更年期生物能量系统受损的三次打击与衰老的慢性低度先天性炎症以及APOEε4血脂异常和适应性免疫反应结合在一起。炎症免疫反应是连接AD各风险因素的统一因素。针对疾病阶段和炎症表型的免疫系统调节剂将提供一种治疗策略,以切断驱动疾病的桥梁。该分析结果为阿尔茨海默病患者抗炎药物临床试验失败提供了合理的机制。此外,它们强调了根据炎症表型对AD临床试验队列进行分层的必要性。考虑了包括针对性使用针对免疫表型的抗炎药物的联合疗法。