• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于2型糖尿病与营养的在线信息的质量和可读性。

Quality and readability of online information about type 2 diabetes and nutrition.

作者信息

Bernard Stephanie, Cooke Tiffany, Cole Tascha, Hachani Laura, Bernard Johnathan

机构信息

Stephanie Bernard is an assistant professor in the PA program at Shenandoah University in Leesburg, Va. Tiffany Cooke practices at Valley GI Consultants in Glendale, Ariz. Tascha Cole is a data manager for the PA program at Shenandoah University. Laura Hachani practices in the cardiac unit at Good Samaritan Hospital in Baltimore, Md. Johnathan Bernard is an orthopedic surgeon at the National Sports Medicine Institute in Leesburg, Va. Dr. Bernard discloses research/grant support from the Arthroscopy Association of North America, Smith and Nephew, Inc., and the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery, and financial or material support from Supreme Orthopedic Systems, LLC, and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

出版信息

JAAPA. 2018 Nov;31(11):41-44. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000546481.02560.4e.

DOI:10.1097/01.JAA.0000546481.02560.4e
PMID:30358679
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The internet has become a vital resource through which patients learn about medical conditions. The aim of this study was to assess the quality and readability of online information about nutrition and diabetes management.

METHODS

An internet search was conducted using three search terms of varying sophistication (how to eat with diabetes, diabetes diet, and medical nutrition therapy for diabetes) and the three most popular search engines (Yahoo, Bing, and Google). Forty-two websites were prospectively analyzed for quality of information and assessed for readability using the Flesch-Kincaid score.

RESULTS

The 42 websites reviewed demonstrated wide variability in quality, regardless of the search term entered. The reading level required to understand the materials varied based on sophistication of the search term and ranged from the 6th- to the 11th-grade level.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of online information on nutrition education for patients with diabetes was extremely variable and readability often was higher than the average American reading level (8th grade). An awareness of quality and readability of the materials found on the internet can strengthen the patient-provider relationship.

摘要

目的

互联网已成为患者了解医疗状况的重要资源。本研究旨在评估有关营养与糖尿病管理的在线信息的质量和可读性。

方法

使用三个不同复杂程度的搜索词(如何应对糖尿病饮食、糖尿病饮食、糖尿病医学营养治疗)以及三个最受欢迎的搜索引擎(雅虎、必应和谷歌)进行互联网搜索。前瞻性分析了42个网站的信息质量,并使用弗莱什-金凯德评分法评估其可读性。

结果

无论输入何种搜索词,所审查的42个网站在质量上都表现出很大差异。理解这些材料所需的阅读水平因搜索词的复杂程度而异,范围从六年级到十一年级水平。

结论

糖尿病患者营养教育的在线信息质量极其参差不齐,可读性通常高于美国平均阅读水平(八年级)。了解互联网上材料的质量和可读性有助于加强医患关系。

相似文献

1
Quality and readability of online information about type 2 diabetes and nutrition.关于2型糖尿病与营养的在线信息的质量和可读性。
JAAPA. 2018 Nov;31(11):41-44. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000546481.02560.4e.
2
What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia.家长们正在阅读的关于喉软化症的内容:喉软化症网络资源的质量与可读性。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 May;108:175-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.02.036. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
3
Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet.互联网上食管胃十二指肠镜(EGD)患者信息质量和可读性分析。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct 29;2018:2849390. doi: 10.1155/2018/2849390. eCollection 2018.
4
Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.评估有关吞咽障碍治疗的互联网信息来源的质量和可读性。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2017 Mar;96(3):128-138. doi: 10.1177/014556131709600312.
5
Internet search term affects the quality and accuracy of online information about developmental hip dysplasia.互联网搜索词会影响有关发育性髋关节发育不良的在线信息的质量和准确性。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Jun;33(4):361-5. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31827d0dd2.
6
Evaluating the Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Resources Pertaining to Hallux Valgus.评估与拇外翻相关的在线资源的质量、准确性和可读性。
Foot Ankle Spec. 2016 Feb;9(1):17-23. doi: 10.1177/1938640015592840. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
7
The Assessment of Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Educational Resources for Platelet-Rich Plasma.富血小板血浆在线教育资源的质量、准确性和可读性评估。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jan;34(1):272-278. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
8
Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea.扁桃体切除术和睡眠呼吸暂停患者信息网站的质量与可读性。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jul;98:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.04.031. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
9
The effect of search term on the quality and accuracy of online information regarding distal radius fractures.搜索词对桡骨远端骨折在线信息的质量和准确性的影响。
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Sep;37(9):1881-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
10
Assessing Readability and Reliability of Online Patient Information Regarding Vestibular Schwannoma.评估关于前庭神经鞘瘤的在线患者信息的可读性和可靠性。
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Dec;38(10):e470-e475. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001565.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between the latent profiles of health information-seeking behaviour and glycated haemoglobin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey in rural areas of China.2型糖尿病患者健康信息寻求行为的潜在类别与糖化血红蛋白水平之间的关系:中国农村地区的横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 21;15(1):e088891. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088891.
2
Content accuracy and readability of dietary advice available on webpages: A systematic review of the evidence.网页上提供的饮食建议的内容准确性和可读性:系统评价证据。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Feb;38(1):e13395. doi: 10.1111/jhn.13395.
3
Evaluating the Reliability of Health Portals' Nutrition and Supplementation Advice for Pregnant Women: A Comprehensive Review.
评估健康门户网站为孕妇提供的营养和补充剂建议的可靠性:全面综述。
Nutrients. 2024 Jun 1;16(11):1739. doi: 10.3390/nu16111739.
4
Evaluation of the Accuracy, Credibility, and Readability of Statin-Related Websites: Cross-Sectional Study.他汀类药物相关网站的准确性、可信度和可读性评估:横断面研究。
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Mar 14;13:e42849. doi: 10.2196/42849.
5
Evaluation of readability levels of online patient education materials for female pelvic floor disorders.评估女性盆底疾病在线患者教育材料的可读性水平。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 29;102(52):e36636. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036636.
6
Evaluating the understandability and actionability of online CKD educational materials.评估在线慢性肾脏病教育资料的易懂性和可操作性。
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2024 Jan;28(1):31-39. doi: 10.1007/s10157-023-02401-6. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
7
Quality and accuracy of online nutrition-related information: a systematic review of content analysis studies.在线营养相关信息的质量和准确性:内容分析研究的系统评价。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Jul;26(7):1345-1357. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023000873. Epub 2023 May 4.
8
Diabetes in the News: Readability Analysis of Malaysian Diabetes Corpus.新闻中的糖尿病:马来西亚糖尿病语料库的可读性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 2;19(11):6802. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116802.
9
Medical Advisability of Youth Pitching Recommendations on the Internet.互联网上关于青少年投球的医学建议适用性
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep 7;9(9):23259671211036692. doi: 10.1177/23259671211036692. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
When Public Health Research Meets Social Media: Knowledge Mapping From 2000 to 2018.当公共卫生研究遇到社交媒体:2000 年至 2018 年的知识图谱
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 13;22(8):e17582. doi: 10.2196/17582.