O'Connell Ferster Ashley P, Hu Amanda
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Dr., Hershey, PA 17033.
Ear Nose Throat J. 2017 Mar;96(3):128-138. doi: 10.1177/014556131709600312.
The Internet has become a popular resource for patient education. The information it provides, however, is rarely peer-reviewed, and its quality may be a concern. Since the average American reads at an 8th grade level, the American Medical Association and the National Institutes of Health have recommended that health information be written at a 4th to 6th grade level. We performed a study to assess the quality and readability of online information regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders. A Google search for "swallowing treatment" was conducted. We studied the first 50 websites that appeared on the search engine's results with the use of the DISCERN quality index tool, the Flesch Ease of Reading Score (FRES), and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) readability test. DISCERN is a validated 16-item questionnaire used to assess the quality of written health information; FRES and FKGL are used to assess readability. We classified the websites as either patient-targeted or professional-targeted sites, as well as either major or minor. The overall DISCERN score was 1.61 ± 0.61 (range: 1 to 5), the overall FRES was 39.1 ± 19.0 (range: 1 to 100), and the overall FKGL was 11.8 ± 3.4 (range: 3 to 12). As would be expected, patient-targeted websites had significantly higher FRES and significantly lower FKGL scores than did the professional-targeted websites (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively); there was no significant difference between the two in DISCERN scores. The major websites had significantly higher DISCERN scores than did the minor sites (p = 0.002); there were no significant differences in FRES and FKGL scores. We conclude that online information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders were of suboptimal quality in that information was written at a level too difficult for the average American to easily understand. Also, the patient-targeted websites were written at a lower reading level, and the major websites contained a higher quality of information.
互联网已成为患者教育的热门资源。然而,它所提供的信息很少经过同行评审,其质量可能令人担忧。由于美国成年人的平均阅读水平为八年级,美国医学协会和美国国立卫生研究院建议健康信息应以四至六年级的水平编写。我们进行了一项研究,以评估有关吞咽障碍治疗的在线信息的质量和可读性。我们在谷歌上搜索了“吞咽治疗”。我们使用DISCERN质量指数工具、弗莱什易读性评分(FRES)和弗莱什-金凯德年级水平(FKGL)可读性测试,研究了搜索引擎结果中出现的前50个网站。DISCERN是一份经过验证的16项问卷,用于评估书面健康信息的质量;FRES和FKGL用于评估可读性。我们将这些网站分为以患者为目标的网站或针对专业人士的网站,以及主要网站或次要网站。DISCERN的总体评分为1.61±0.61(范围:1至5),FRES的总体评分为39.1±19.0(范围:1至100),FKGL的总体评分为11.8±3.4(范围:3至12)。正如预期的那样,以患者为目标的网站的FRES显著高于针对专业人士的网站,FKGL得分则显著低于针对专业人士的网站(分别为p = 0.01和p = 0.04);两者在DISCERN评分上没有显著差异。主要网站的DISCERN评分显著高于次要网站(p = 0.002);FRES和FKGL评分没有显著差异。我们得出结论,关于吞咽障碍治疗的在线信息来源质量欠佳,因为所提供信息的难度对于普通美国人来说难以轻松理解。此外,以患者为目标的网站的阅读水平较低,而主要网站包含的信息质量较高。