Centre for Clinical Ethics, St. Joseph's Health Centre Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Philosophy and Psychiatry & School of Health Studies, Western University, London, Canada.
Bioethics. 2019 May;33(4):475-486. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12517. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
There are reasons to believe that decision-making capacity (mental competence) of women in labor may be compromised in relation to giving informed consent to epidural analgesia. Not only severe labor pain, but also stress, anxiety, and premedication of analgesics such as opioids, may influence women's decisional capacity. Decision-making capacity is a complex construct involving cognitive and emotional components which cannot be reduced to 'understanding' alone. A systematic literature search identified a total of 20 empirical studies focused on women's decision-making about epidural analgesia for labor pain. Our review of these studies suggests that empirical evidence to date is insufficient to determine whether women undergoing labor are capable of consenting to epidural analgesia. Given such uncertainties, sufficient information about pain management should be provided as part of prenatal education and the consent process must be carefully conducted to enhance women's autonomy. To fill in the significant gap in clinical knowledge about laboring women's decision-making capacity, well-designed prospective and retrospective studies may be required.
有理由相信,产妇在决定是否接受硬膜外镇痛时的决策能力(精神能力)可能受到影响。不仅是剧烈的分娩疼痛,还有压力、焦虑以及阿片类药物等镇痛药物的预先用药,都可能影响女性的决策能力。决策能力是一个复杂的结构,涉及认知和情感成分,不能仅仅简化为“理解”。系统的文献检索共确定了 20 项针对产妇对分娩疼痛进行硬膜外镇痛的决策的实证研究。我们对这些研究的回顾表明,迄今为止,实证证据还不足以确定正在分娩的妇女是否有能力同意接受硬膜外镇痛。鉴于存在这些不确定性,应在产前教育中提供关于疼痛管理的充分信息,并且必须仔细进行同意过程,以增强女性的自主权。为了填补关于产妇决策能力的临床知识的重大空白,可能需要进行精心设计的前瞻性和回顾性研究。