• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险福利重新设计:提高受益人的可承受性,同时促进选择和竞争。

Medicare Benefit Redesign: Enhancing Affordability for Beneficiaries While Promoting Choice and Competition.

作者信息

Schoen Cathy, Davis Karen, Buttorf Christine, Willink Amber

机构信息

New York Academy of Medicine.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

出版信息

Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2018 Oct 1;2018:1-14.

PMID:30358960
Abstract

ISSUE

Out-of-pocket expenses are capped for enrollees in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans but not for beneficiaries in traditional Medicare, which also requires a high deductible for hospital care. The need for supplemental Medigap coverage adds to traditional Medicare’s complexity and administrative costs. Shortfalls in financial protection also make it difficult to offer traditional Medicare as a choice for people under age 65, as some have proposed.

GOALS

Describe alternative benefit designs that would limit out-of-pocket costs for traditional Medicare’s core services, assess their cost, and illustrate financing mechanisms.

METHODS

Analysis of a $3,500 ceiling on annual out-of-pocket expenses for Parts A and B benefits and options for replacing Part A hospital cost-sharing with a $350 or $100 copayment per admission.

KEY FINDINGS

Estimates of the costs of the reforms are $36–$44 per beneficiary per month, assuming no behavioral or supplemental coverage changes. This could be financed by a $9–$11 increase in premiums combined with a 0.3-to-0.4-percentage-point increase in the Medicare payroll tax (split between employer and employees). Medicaid costs would decrease, while employers, retirees, and Medigap enrollees would see reduced premiums.

CONCLUSION

The reforms would improve affordability and put traditional Medicare on a more equal footing with MA plans. They would also make it easier to open traditional Medicare to people under age 65.

摘要

问题

医疗保险优势(MA)计划参保人的自付费用有上限,但传统医疗保险受益人的自付费用没有上限,而且传统医疗保险在住院治疗方面还需要高额免赔额。补充性医保缺口保险的需求增加了传统医疗保险的复杂性和管理成本。财务保障方面的不足也使得按照一些人的提议,将传统医疗保险作为65岁以下人群的一种选择变得困难。

目标

描述能够限制传统医疗保险核心服务自付费用的替代福利设计,评估其成本,并说明融资机制。

方法

分析对A部分和B部分福利设定每年3500美元的自付费用上限,以及用每次住院350美元或100美元的共付额取代A部分住院费用分摊的选项。

主要发现

假设行为或补充保险没有变化,改革成本估计为每位受益人每月36 - 44美元。这可以通过将保费提高9 - 11美元,同时将医疗保险工资税提高0.3至0.4个百分点(由雇主和雇员分摊)来融资。医疗补助成本将下降,而雇主、退休人员和医保缺口保险参保人的保费将降低。

结论

这些改革将提高可承受性,使传统医疗保险与MA计划处于更平等的地位。它们还将使向65岁以下人群开放传统医疗保险变得更容易。

相似文献

1
Medicare Benefit Redesign: Enhancing Affordability for Beneficiaries While Promoting Choice and Competition.医疗保险福利重新设计:提高受益人的可承受性,同时促进选择和竞争。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2018 Oct 1;2018:1-14.
2
Medicare essential: an option to promote better care and curb spending growth.医疗保险基本法:促进更好的医疗服务和控制支出增长的一种选择。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 May;32(5):900-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1203.
3
Out-of-pocket health spending by poor and near-poor elderly Medicare beneficiaries.贫困和接近贫困的老年医疗保险受益人的自付医疗费用。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):241-54.
4
Will choice-based reform work for Medicare? Evidence from the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.基于选择的改革对医疗保险是否有效?来自联邦雇员健康福利计划的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1741-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00580.x.
5
Modernizing Medicare's Benefit Design and Low-Income Subsidies to Ensure Access and Affordability.使医疗保险福利设计和低收入补贴现代化,以确保可及性和可负担性。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Jul;21:1-13.
6
Recent proposals to limit Medigap coverage and modify Medicare cost sharing.近期关于限制补充医疗保险覆盖范围及调整医疗保险费用分担的提议。
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Natl Health Policy Forum. 2012 Feb 24(845):1-19.
7
Medicare: looking for pareto optimal changes.医疗保险:寻求帕累托最优变革。
Inquiry. 1992 Winter;29(4):426-39.
8
A Policy Option to Enhance Access and Affordability for Medicare’s Low-Income Beneficiaries.一项提高医疗保险低收入受益人群可及性和可负担性的政策选择。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2018 Sep 1;2018:1-15.
9
Medigap: prevalence, premiums, and opportunities for reform.医保补充保险:患病率、保费及改革机遇
NHPF Issue Brief. 2002 Sep 9(782):1-23.
10
Medicare program; Medicare prescription drug benefit. Final rule.医疗保险计划;医疗保险处方药福利。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2005 Jan 28;70(18):4193-585.