Detection limits of optical gas imagers as a function of temperature differential and distance.

Optical gas imaging (OGI) is an effective tool for detecting gas leaks from process equipment. Despite the fact that OGI has been used for leak detection for over a decade, its detection limit is an elusive performance metric and has not been systematically characterized and quantified like other detection instruments. A substantial body of research has been performed that has shed some light on the OGI detection limits and the factors that dictate the detection limits. The OGI detection limit expressed as ppm-m and ppm now can be quantified as a function of ΔT (differential temperature between the gas plume and the background), the OGI camera type, and the specific gas in question. Furthermore, the OGI detection limit expressed as grams per hour can be calculated based on the ΔT and the distance from the OGI camera to the leak location under common leak survey conditions. For the same OGI camera, the detection limit can vary by several orders of magnitude due to ΔT and distance. The present work has demonstrated how different OGI detection limits can be. More importantly, this work has, for the first time, formulated equations that can be used to determine OGI detection limits with a given set of leak detection conditions. Being able to quantify OGI detection limit and understand the variables that dictate the detection limit is a significant advancement. It will help OGI to become accepted as a mature field instrument. The variables characterized in this work should have an impact on the development of OGI leak survey protocols, such as Appendix K to Code of Federal Regulations 40 CFR Part 60 in the United States. Established detection limits will also help emission inventory for fugitive emissions when OGI is used as the sole leak detection method. Implications: Optical gas imaging (OGI) has been used for leak detection and control of fugitive volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions and methane emissions due to equipment leaks. However, detection limits of OGI have not been characterized and quantified like other detection instruments. The lack of well-understood detection limits has hindered broader applications of OGI. The work presented in this paper represents important steps that will enable OGI users and policymakers to establish (1) OGI detection limits under various conditions, (2) OGI leak survey criteria for a desired minimum detectable leak size, and (3) maximum potential emissions from the nondetect sources in emission inventory studies.