Merkulova Ekaterina, Savostyanov Alexander, Bocharov Andrey, Proshina Ekaterina, Knyazev Gennady
Laboratory of Psychophysiology of Individual Differences, Institute of Physiology and Basic Medicine, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Humanitarian Institute, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2018 Oct 22;8(10):97. doi: 10.3390/bs8100097.
Accurate repeatability of experimental data is the basis of professional scientific research. In this study we analyzed three consecutive experiments: The subjects had to complete a questionnaire three times under similar conditions within a 2⁻3 week interval to ensure reproducibility of the original data from experiment to experiment, using the method of test⁻retest reliability. Absolute reliability was assessed by the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest real difference (SRD). The relative reliability was estimated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,1) (average measures) and the results demonstrate almost perfect agreement. The social interaction model was applied for organization of the experimental study. In this virtual model, the participants had to choose one of three types of reactions (i.e., attacking, avoiding, or friendly) to stimuli-facial expressions (i.e., angry, fearful, sad, neutral, and happy). The results show significant correlation between personal characteristics and social interactions. The results of the influence of such personal characteristics as agreeableness, collectivism, extraversion, neuroticism, and those shown on the Relational-interdependent Self-Construal Scale and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory are highly consistent with other researchers' data and common sense.
实验数据的准确可重复性是专业科学研究的基础。在本研究中，我们分析了三个连续的实验：受试者必须在2至3周的间隔内，在相似条件下三次完成一份问卷，以确保每次实验原始数据的可重复性，采用重测信度法。绝对信度通过测量标准误（SEM）和最小真实差异（SRD）进行评估。相对信度通过计算组内相关系数（ICC3,1）（平均测量值）来估计，结果显示几乎完全一致。社会互动模型被应用于组织实验研究。在这个虚拟模型中，参与者必须对刺激——面部表情（即愤怒、恐惧、悲伤、中性和快乐）选择三种反应类型之一（即攻击、回避或友好）。结果表明个人特征与社会互动之间存在显著相关性。诸如宜人性、集体主义、外向性、神经质等个人特征以及关系相互依存自我构念量表和状态——特质焦虑量表上所显示的特征的影响结果与其他研究人员的数据和常识高度一致。
