Swinbourne Michael J, Taggart David A, Ostendorf Bertram
School of Biological Science, University of Adelaide, L3 Oliphant Bldg, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Animals (Basel). 2018 Oct 23;8(11):186. doi: 10.3390/ani8110186.
Broad-scale abundance estimates of the southern hairy-nosed wombat population use a proxy measure based on counting the number of active burrows, which is multiplied by an index of 'wombats/active burrow'. However, the extant indices were calculated in the 1980s, prior to the use of calicivirus to control rabbits, and used invasive monitoring methods which may have affected the results. We hypothesise that the use of video might provide a logistically simple, non-invasive means of calculating updated indices. To this end, motion-activated, infra-red still and video cameras were placed at various distances outside active wombat burrows in the South Australian Murraylands and Eyre Peninsula regions. The captured imagery was inspected to determine how often the burrow was occupied by one or more wombats, and how effective the cameras were at detecting wombat activity. Video data was clearly superior to the still imagery, with more than twice as many burrow occupancies being positively identified (still: 43%). The indices of wombats/active burrow calculated based on video imagery were: Murraylands: 0.43, Eyre Peninsula: 0.42. 1948 false positive videos were recorded, of which 1674 (86%) occurred between noon and sunset.
对南部毛鼻袋熊种群进行大规模丰度估计时,采用了一种基于计算活跃洞穴数量的替代测量方法,该数量乘以“袋熊/活跃洞穴”指数。然而,现有的指数是在20世纪80年代计算的,在使用杯状病毒控制兔子之前,并且使用了可能影响结果的侵入性监测方法。我们假设使用视频可能提供一种在后勤上简单、非侵入性的计算更新指数的方法。为此,在南澳大利亚默里兰兹和艾尔半岛地区,将运动激活的红外静态相机和视频相机放置在活跃袋熊洞穴外的不同距离处。检查捕获的图像,以确定洞穴被一只或多只袋熊占据的频率,以及相机检测袋熊活动的效果。视频数据明显优于静态图像,确定有袋熊占据洞穴的次数是静态图像的两倍多(静态图像:43%)。根据视频图像计算的“袋熊/活跃洞穴”指数为:默里兰兹:0.43,艾尔半岛:0.42。记录到1948个误报视频,其中1674个(86%)发生在中午至日落之间。