关于有精神健康问题的躁动儿童中 PRN 使用的我们真正了解多少:临床综述。
What do we really know about PRN use in agitated children with mental health conditions: a clinical review.
机构信息
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stonybrook, New York, USA.
出版信息
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Nov;21(4):166-170. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2018-300039. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
What is the evidence that 'pro re nata' (PRN) medication is effective for ending agitated outbursts in children and adolescents in psychiatric emergency rooms or inpatient units? Literature search was performed for studies of PRN medication use in children and adolescents that included an outcome measure. One randomised controlled trial, three prospective studies and six retrospective studies that included some outcome measure were identified. Outcome measures were heterogeneous, and frequently did not use standardised metrics assessing agitation level to measure effectiveness. The single small Randomized Controlled Trial (RTC) does not find a difference between placebo and medication, and outcomes of other studies do not control for potential placebo effect of the intervention itself as opposed to the medication. There is insufficient evidence to support the common practice of PRN medications for the management of acute agitation, and no data with which to inform clinical practice, such as which medicines and doses are helpful for specific populations or situations. Psychiatrists have no evidence-based medication interventions for acutely managing agitated outbursts in children and adolescents.
“按需”(PRN)药物在精神科急诊室或住院病房中用于终止儿童和青少年激越发作是否有效,有何证据?针对包括结局指标在内的儿童和青少年 PRN 药物使用研究进行了文献检索。确定了一项随机对照试验、三项前瞻性研究和六项回顾性研究,其中包括一些结局指标。结局指标具有异质性,并且通常未使用评估激越程度的标准化指标来衡量疗效。唯一的小型随机对照试验(RCT)并未发现安慰剂和药物之间存在差异,其他研究的结果也没有控制干预本身相对于药物的潜在安慰剂效应。没有足够的证据支持 PRN 药物用于管理急性激越的常见做法,也没有数据可以为临床实践提供信息,例如哪些药物和剂量对特定人群或情况有帮助。精神科医生没有针对儿童和青少年急性激越发作的基于证据的药物干预措施。