Suppr超能文献

左心室辅助装置植入期间同期二尖瓣手术治疗重度二尖瓣反流的效果

Effect of concomitant mitral valve procedures for severe mitral regurgitation during left ventricular assist device implantation.

作者信息

Kawabori Masashi, Kurihara Chitaru, Conyer Ryan T, Critsinelis Andre C, Sugiura Tadahisa, Rosengart Todd, Morgan Jeffrey A

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Circulatory Support, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Cardiopulmonary Transplantation and Center for Cardiac Support, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Artif Organs. 2019 Jun;22(2):91-97. doi: 10.1007/s10047-018-1076-8. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

Abstract

The effect of performing a concomitant mitral valve procedure (MVP) during continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation has been reported for patients with moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation (MR), but moderate MR is less of a clinical concern for CF-LVAD patients. There is a paucity of reports focusing on patients with severe MR. Thus, the purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of performing a concomitant MVP during CF-LVAD implantation in patients with severe preoperative MR. Between November 2003 and March 2016, 526 patients underwent primary implantation of a CF-LVAD at our center. Patients with severe MR who underwent a concomitant MVP were compared to those who did not in regard to overall survival, perioperative complications, postoperative echocardiography data, bridge-to-transplantation success, and CF-LVAD explantation. Of the 108 patients with severe MR, 26 underwent a concomitant MVP and 82 did not. These groups showed no difference in survival (p = 0.61). Additionally, the two groups had similar rates of postoperative right heart failure (p = 0.69) and readmissions (p = 0.42). The 24-month follow-up echocardiography results were also similar. Furthermore, the groups showed no difference in bridge-to-cardiac transplantation success (30.0% vs 25.0%, p = 0.80) or CF-LVAD explantation rates (0.0% vs 0.0%. p = 1.0). Our findings suggest that patients with severe MR who undergo a MVP during CF-LVAD implantation do not have superior outcomes to those who do not. However, assessments of other outcomes may show some benefits to performing concomitant MVPs.

摘要

对于中重度二尖瓣反流(MR)患者,在连续流左心室辅助装置(CF-LVAD)植入期间同期进行二尖瓣手术(MVP)的效果已有报道,但中度MR对CF-LVAD患者来说临床关注较少。针对重度MR患者的报道较少。因此,本研究的目的是分析在CF-LVAD植入期间同期进行MVP对术前重度MR患者的影响。2003年11月至2016年3月期间,526例患者在我们中心接受了CF-LVAD初次植入。将同期进行MVP的重度MR患者与未进行MVP的患者在总生存率、围手术期并发症、术后超声心动图数据、桥接移植成功率和CF-LVAD取出方面进行比较。在108例重度MR患者中,26例同期进行了MVP,82例未进行。这些组在生存率方面无差异(p = 0.61)。此外,两组术后右心衰竭发生率(p = 0.69)和再入院率(p = 0.42)相似。24个月随访的超声心动图结果也相似。此外,两组在桥接心脏移植成功率(30.0%对25.0%,p = 0.80)或CF-LVAD取出率(0.0%对0.0%,p = 1.0)方面无差异。我们的研究结果表明,在CF-LVAD植入期间进行MVP的重度MR患者,其结局并不优于未进行MVP者。然而,对其他结局的评估可能显示同期进行MVP有一些益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验