Hata Hiroki, Fujita Tomoyuki, Ishibashi-Ueda Hatsue, Kuroda Kensuke, Seguchi Osamu, Matsumoto Yorihiko, Yanase Masanobu, Sato Takuma, Nakajima Seiko, Fukushima Norihide, Kobayashi Junjiro
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1, Fujishiro-dai, Suita, Osaka, 565-8565, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
J Artif Organs. 2018 Jun;21(2):164-171. doi: 10.1007/s10047-017-1010-5. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
Although mitral regurgitation (MR) is prevalent in patients with end-stage heart failure, the impact of mitral valve (MV) surgery on outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and morphologic changes of MV remains unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 74 patients who underwent LVAD implantation as a bridge to transplant. Of these, 11 (15%) underwent MV repair concomitant with or prior to LVAD implantation, while 27 patients with preoperative significant (moderate or greater) MR did not undergo concomitant MV surgery. The mean interval between LVAD implantation and the last echocardiographic examination was 913 days. Irrespective of MV surgery, significant LV reverse remodeling including decreased LV and left atrial dimension and improved MR severity was observed in all patients except for patients with prior MV surgery. Histopathological examination of explanted hearts removed at heart transplantation (n = 69) or autopsy (n = 5) revealed that the MV annulus was still dilated (mean perimeter 11.7 cm) in the patients with preoperative significant MR and no concomitant MV surgery. Concomitant MV surgery at the time of LVAD implantation for significant MR might not be always necessary for bridge to transplant or destination therapy cases. However, it might be required in patients having potential for cardiac recovery or patients with severe pulmonary hypertension and depressed right ventricle.
尽管二尖瓣反流(MR)在终末期心力衰竭患者中很常见,但二尖瓣(MV)手术对左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后结局的影响以及MV的形态学变化仍不清楚。我们回顾性分析了74例接受LVAD植入作为移植过渡的患者。其中,11例(15%)在LVAD植入时或之前同时进行了MV修复,而27例术前有显著(中度或更严重)MR的患者未进行同期MV手术。LVAD植入与最后一次超声心动图检查之间的平均间隔为913天。除了之前接受过MV手术的患者外,所有患者均观察到显著的左心室逆向重构,包括左心室和左心房尺寸减小以及MR严重程度改善,与是否进行MV手术无关。对心脏移植时取出的心脏(n = 69)或尸检时取出的心脏(n = 5)进行组织病理学检查发现,术前有显著MR且未进行同期MV手术的患者,其MV瓣环仍有扩张(平均周长11.7 cm)。对于移植过渡或目标治疗病例,LVAD植入时同期进行MV手术治疗显著MR可能并非总是必要的。然而,对于有心脏恢复潜力的患者或有严重肺动脉高压和右心室功能不全的患者,可能需要进行该手术。